* property constants in elisp formulas
@ 2007-10-18 22:06 Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-19 16:11 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-10-18 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: org-mode list
Hi,
Is there a better way to do this?
===== sample file =====
* top
:PROPERTIES:
:d_5: 0
:h_5: 8
:m_5: 16
:d_4: 2
:h_4: 18
:m_4: 58
:d_3: 6
:h_3: 11
:m_3: 33
:d_2: 3
:h_2: 13
:m_2: 36
:d_1: 0
:h_1: 13
:m_1: 59
:d_0: 0
:h_0: 6
:m_0: 23
:d_n: 17
:h_n: 8
:m_n: 59
:END:
*** test
| | day | hour | minute |
|---+-----+------+--------|
| # | 0 | 8 | 16 |
| # | 2 | 18 | 58 |
| # | 6 | 11 | 33 |
| # | 3 | 13 | 36 |
| # | 0 | 13 | 59 |
| # | 0 | 6 | 23 |
| # | 17 | 8 | 59 |
#+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car
'$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car
'$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car
'$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car
'$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car
'$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car
'$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car
'$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car
'$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car
'$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n)
====================
Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant with
an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens
such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other hand,
maybe I can use that to store a list in a property.
Edd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas
2007-10-18 22:06 property constants in elisp formulas Eddward DeVilla
@ 2007-10-19 16:11 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-19 20:32 ` Eddward DeVilla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-19 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eddward DeVilla; +Cc: org-mode list
You are right, there should be no parenthesis in Lisp interpolation.
Will be fixed in 5.14.
- Carsten
On Oct 19, 2007, at 0:06, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a better way to do this?
>
> ===== sample file =====
> * top
> :PROPERTIES:
> :d_5: 0
> :h_5: 8
> :m_5: 16
> :d_4: 2
> :h_4: 18
> :m_4: 58
> :d_3: 6
> :h_3: 11
> :m_3: 33
> :d_2: 3
> :h_2: 13
> :m_2: 36
> :d_1: 0
> :h_1: 13
> :m_1: 59
> :d_0: 0
> :h_0: 6
> :m_0: 23
> :d_n: 17
> :h_n: 8
> :m_n: 59
> :END:
>
> *** test
> | | day | hour | minute |
> |---+-----+------+--------|
> | # | 0 | 8 | 16 |
> | # | 2 | 18 | 58 |
> | # | 6 | 11 | 33 |
> | # | 3 | 13 | 36 |
> | # | 0 | 13 | 59 |
> | # | 0 | 6 | 23 |
> | # | 17 | 8 | 59 |
> #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car
> '$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car
> '$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car
> '$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car
> '$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car
> '$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car
> '$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car
> '$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car
> '$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car
> '$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n)
>
> ====================
>
> Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant with
> an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens
> such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other hand,
> maybe I can use that to store a list in a property.
>
> Edd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>
--
Carsten Dominik
Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Kruislaan 403
NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
phone: +31 20 525 7477
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas
2007-10-19 16:11 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-10-19 20:32 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-23 5:10 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-10-19 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode list
Now, just as a stupid question, if I put a lisp expression into a
property, can I use it in a formula?
===== sample ========
* top
:PROPERTIES:
:fives: (0 8 16)
:fours: (2 18 58)
:threes: (6 11 33)
:twos: (3 13 36)
:ones: (0 13 59)
:zeros: (0 6 23)
:null: (17 8 59)
:END:
*** test 1
| | day | hour | minute |
|---+-----+------+--------|
| # | 0 | 8 | 16 |
| # | 2 | 18 | 58 |
| # | 6 | 11 | 33 |
| # | 3 | 13 | 36 |
| # | 0 | 13 | 59 |
| # | 0 | 6 | 23 |
| # | 17 | 8 | 59 |
#+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_fives)::@2$3='(cadr
'$PROP_fives)::@2$4='(caddr '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car
'$PROP_fours)::@3$3='(cadr '$PROP_fours)::@3$4='(caddr
'$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car '$PROP_threes)::@4$3='(cadr
'$PROP_threes)::@4$4='(caddr '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car
'$PROP_twos)::@5$3='(cadr '$PROP_twos)::@5$4='(caddr
'$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car '$PROP_ones)::@6$3='(cadr
'$PROP_ones)::@6$4='(caddr '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car
'$PROP_zeros)::@7$3='(cadr '$PROP_zeros)::@7$4='(caddr
'$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null)::@8$3='(cadr
'$PROP_null)::@8$4='(caddr '$PROP_null)
==========================
Also, in the above example, the property values were aligned for me.
In my previous example, that didn't happen. It seems that the
alignment code does like underscores in names
===== sample ======
* top
:PROPERTIES:
:fives: 0 8 16
:d_5: 0
:fours: 2 18 58
:END:
=================
Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that
I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with C-c
'. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs.
====== sample =======
* top
:PROPERTIES:
:fives: 0 8 16
:fours: 2 18 58
:threes: 6 11 33
:twos: 3 13 36
:ones: 0 13 59
:zeros: 0 6 23
:null: 17 8 59
:END:
*** test 2
| | day | |
|---+-----+----|
| # | 0 | 0 |
| # | 2 | 2 |
| # | 6 | 8 |
| # | 3 | 11 |
| # | 0 | 11 |
| # | 0 | 11 |
| # | 17 | 28 |
#+TBLFM: $3='(apply '+ '(@-I$2..$2));N::@2$2='(car
'$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car
'$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car
'$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null)
====================
Edd
On 10/19/07, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote:
> You are right, there should be no parenthesis in Lisp interpolation.
> Will be fixed in 5.14.
>
> - Carsten
>
> On Oct 19, 2007, at 0:06, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a better way to do this?
> >
> > ===== sample file =====
> > * top
> > :PROPERTIES:
> > :d_5: 0
> > :h_5: 8
> > :m_5: 16
> > :d_4: 2
> > :h_4: 18
> > :m_4: 58
> > :d_3: 6
> > :h_3: 11
> > :m_3: 33
> > :d_2: 3
> > :h_2: 13
> > :m_2: 36
> > :d_1: 0
> > :h_1: 13
> > :m_1: 59
> > :d_0: 0
> > :h_0: 6
> > :m_0: 23
> > :d_n: 17
> > :h_n: 8
> > :m_n: 59
> > :END:
> >
> > *** test
> > | | day | hour | minute |
> > |---+-----+------+--------|
> > | # | 0 | 8 | 16 |
> > | # | 2 | 18 | 58 |
> > | # | 6 | 11 | 33 |
> > | # | 3 | 13 | 36 |
> > | # | 0 | 13 | 59 |
> > | # | 0 | 6 | 23 |
> > | # | 17 | 8 | 59 |
> > #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car
> > '$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car
> > '$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car
> > '$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car
> > '$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car
> > '$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car
> > '$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car
> > '$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car
> > '$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car
> > '$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n)
> >
> > ====================
> >
> > Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant with
> > an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens
> > such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other hand,
> > maybe I can use that to store a list in a property.
> >
> > Edd
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carsten Dominik
> Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
> Universiteit van Amsterdam
> Kruislaan 403
> NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
> phone: +31 20 525 7477
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas
2007-10-19 20:32 ` Eddward DeVilla
@ 2007-10-23 5:10 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-23 15:06 ` Eddward DeVilla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-23 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eddward DeVilla; +Cc: org-mode list
I believe you can, yes. Why don;y you just try and watch the effect
by turning on formula debugging?
BTW, 5.13d omits the parenthesis in Lisp formula interpolation...
- Carsten
On Oct 19, 2007, at 10:32 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> Now, just as a stupid question, if I put a lisp expression into a
> property, can I use it in a formula?
>
> ===== sample ========
> * top
> :PROPERTIES:
> :fives: (0 8 16)
> :fours: (2 18 58)
> :threes: (6 11 33)
> :twos: (3 13 36)
> :ones: (0 13 59)
> :zeros: (0 6 23)
> :null: (17 8 59)
> :END:
>
> *** test 1
> | | day | hour | minute |
> |---+-----+------+--------|
> | # | 0 | 8 | 16 |
> | # | 2 | 18 | 58 |
> | # | 6 | 11 | 33 |
> | # | 3 | 13 | 36 |
> | # | 0 | 13 | 59 |
> | # | 0 | 6 | 23 |
> | # | 17 | 8 | 59 |
> #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_fives)::@2$3='(cadr
> '$PROP_fives)::@2$4='(caddr '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car
> '$PROP_fours)::@3$3='(cadr '$PROP_fours)::@3$4='(caddr
> '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car '$PROP_threes)::@4$3='(cadr
> '$PROP_threes)::@4$4='(caddr '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car
> '$PROP_twos)::@5$3='(cadr '$PROP_twos)::@5$4='(caddr
> '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car '$PROP_ones)::@6$3='(cadr
> '$PROP_ones)::@6$4='(caddr '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car
> '$PROP_zeros)::@7$3='(cadr '$PROP_zeros)::@7$4='(caddr
> '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null)::@8$3='(cadr
> '$PROP_null)::@8$4='(caddr '$PROP_null)
>
> ==========================
>
> Also, in the above example, the property values were aligned for me.
> In my previous example, that didn't happen. It seems that the
> alignment code does like underscores in names
>
> ===== sample ======
> * top
> :PROPERTIES:
> :fives: 0 8 16
> :d_5: 0
> :fours: 2 18 58
> :END:
>
> =================
>
> Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that
> I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with C-c
> '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs.
>
> ====== sample =======
> * top
> :PROPERTIES:
> :fives: 0 8 16
> :fours: 2 18 58
> :threes: 6 11 33
> :twos: 3 13 36
> :ones: 0 13 59
> :zeros: 0 6 23
> :null: 17 8 59
> :END:
>
> *** test 2
> | | day | |
> |---+-----+----|
> | # | 0 | 0 |
> | # | 2 | 2 |
> | # | 6 | 8 |
> | # | 3 | 11 |
> | # | 0 | 11 |
> | # | 0 | 11 |
> | # | 17 | 28 |
> #+TBLFM: $3='(apply '+ '(@-I$2..$2));N::@2$2='(car
> '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car
> '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car
> '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null)
>
> ====================
>
> Edd
>
> On 10/19/07, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote:
>> You are right, there should be no parenthesis in Lisp interpolation.
>> Will be fixed in 5.14.
>>
>> - Carsten
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2007, at 0:06, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a better way to do this?
>>>
>>> ===== sample file =====
>>> * top
>>> :PROPERTIES:
>>> :d_5: 0
>>> :h_5: 8
>>> :m_5: 16
>>> :d_4: 2
>>> :h_4: 18
>>> :m_4: 58
>>> :d_3: 6
>>> :h_3: 11
>>> :m_3: 33
>>> :d_2: 3
>>> :h_2: 13
>>> :m_2: 36
>>> :d_1: 0
>>> :h_1: 13
>>> :m_1: 59
>>> :d_0: 0
>>> :h_0: 6
>>> :m_0: 23
>>> :d_n: 17
>>> :h_n: 8
>>> :m_n: 59
>>> :END:
>>>
>>> *** test
>>> | | day | hour | minute |
>>> |---+-----+------+--------|
>>> | # | 0 | 8 | 16 |
>>> | # | 2 | 18 | 58 |
>>> | # | 6 | 11 | 33 |
>>> | # | 3 | 13 | 36 |
>>> | # | 0 | 13 | 59 |
>>> | # | 0 | 6 | 23 |
>>> | # | 17 | 8 | 59 |
>>> #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car
>>> '$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car
>>> '$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car
>>> '$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car
>>> '$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car
>>> '$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car
>>> '$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car
>>> '$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car
>>> '$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car
>>> '$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n)
>>>
>>> ====================
>>>
>>> Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant
>>> with
>>> an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens
>>> such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other
>>> hand,
>>> maybe I can use that to store a list in a property.
>>>
>>> Edd
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Carsten Dominik
>> Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
>> Universiteit van Amsterdam
>> Kruislaan 403
>> NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
>> phone: +31 20 525 7477
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas
2007-10-23 5:10 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-10-23 15:06 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-11-01 8:36 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-10-23 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode list
On 10/23/07, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe you can, yes. Why don;y you just try and watch the effect
> by turning on formula debugging?
It works now. I just wasn't sure if it was supposed to. cool.
> BTW, 5.13d omits the parenthesis in Lisp formula interpolation...
Great! Thanks. Did you notice the other two problems in my email? I
wasn't sure if they got lost after the long example. The underscore
in properties isn't that big of a deal, but the problem with the
formula editor is really annoying.
Edd
> - Carsten
>
> On Oct 19, 2007, at 10:32 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
>
> > Now, just as a stupid question, if I put a lisp expression into a
> > property, can I use it in a formula?
> >
> > ===== sample ========
> > * top
> > :PROPERTIES:
> > :fives: (0 8 16)
> > :fours: (2 18 58)
> > :threes: (6 11 33)
> > :twos: (3 13 36)
> > :ones: (0 13 59)
> > :zeros: (0 6 23)
> > :null: (17 8 59)
> > :END:
> >
> > *** test 1
> > | | day | hour | minute |
> > |---+-----+------+--------|
> > | # | 0 | 8 | 16 |
> > | # | 2 | 18 | 58 |
> > | # | 6 | 11 | 33 |
> > | # | 3 | 13 | 36 |
> > | # | 0 | 13 | 59 |
> > | # | 0 | 6 | 23 |
> > | # | 17 | 8 | 59 |
> > #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_fives)::@2$3='(cadr
> > '$PROP_fives)::@2$4='(caddr '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car
> > '$PROP_fours)::@3$3='(cadr '$PROP_fours)::@3$4='(caddr
> > '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car '$PROP_threes)::@4$3='(cadr
> > '$PROP_threes)::@4$4='(caddr '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car
> > '$PROP_twos)::@5$3='(cadr '$PROP_twos)::@5$4='(caddr
> > '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car '$PROP_ones)::@6$3='(cadr
> > '$PROP_ones)::@6$4='(caddr '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car
> > '$PROP_zeros)::@7$3='(cadr '$PROP_zeros)::@7$4='(caddr
> > '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null)::@8$3='(cadr
> > '$PROP_null)::@8$4='(caddr '$PROP_null)
> >
> > ==========================
> >
> > Also, in the above example, the property values were aligned for me.
> > In my previous example, that didn't happen. It seems that the
> > alignment code does like underscores in names
> >
> > ===== sample ======
> > * top
> > :PROPERTIES:
> > :fives: 0 8 16
> > :d_5: 0
> > :fours: 2 18 58
> > :END:
> >
> > =================
> >
> > Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that
> > I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with C-c
> > '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs.
> >
> > ====== sample =======
> > * top
> > :PROPERTIES:
> > :fives: 0 8 16
> > :fours: 2 18 58
> > :threes: 6 11 33
> > :twos: 3 13 36
> > :ones: 0 13 59
> > :zeros: 0 6 23
> > :null: 17 8 59
> > :END:
> >
> > *** test 2
> > | | day | |
> > |---+-----+----|
> > | # | 0 | 0 |
> > | # | 2 | 2 |
> > | # | 6 | 8 |
> > | # | 3 | 11 |
> > | # | 0 | 11 |
> > | # | 0 | 11 |
> > | # | 17 | 28 |
> > #+TBLFM: $3='(apply '+ '(@-I$2..$2));N::@2$2='(car
> > '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car
> > '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car
> > '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null)
> >
> > ====================
> >
> > Edd
> >
> > On 10/19/07, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote:
> >> You are right, there should be no parenthesis in Lisp interpolation.
> >> Will be fixed in 5.14.
> >>
> >> - Carsten
> >>
> >> On Oct 19, 2007, at 0:06, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Is there a better way to do this?
> >>>
> >>> ===== sample file =====
> >>> * top
> >>> :PROPERTIES:
> >>> :d_5: 0
> >>> :h_5: 8
> >>> :m_5: 16
> >>> :d_4: 2
> >>> :h_4: 18
> >>> :m_4: 58
> >>> :d_3: 6
> >>> :h_3: 11
> >>> :m_3: 33
> >>> :d_2: 3
> >>> :h_2: 13
> >>> :m_2: 36
> >>> :d_1: 0
> >>> :h_1: 13
> >>> :m_1: 59
> >>> :d_0: 0
> >>> :h_0: 6
> >>> :m_0: 23
> >>> :d_n: 17
> >>> :h_n: 8
> >>> :m_n: 59
> >>> :END:
> >>>
> >>> *** test
> >>> | | day | hour | minute |
> >>> |---+-----+------+--------|
> >>> | # | 0 | 8 | 16 |
> >>> | # | 2 | 18 | 58 |
> >>> | # | 6 | 11 | 33 |
> >>> | # | 3 | 13 | 36 |
> >>> | # | 0 | 13 | 59 |
> >>> | # | 0 | 6 | 23 |
> >>> | # | 17 | 8 | 59 |
> >>> #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car
> >>> '$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car
> >>> '$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car
> >>> '$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car
> >>> '$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car
> >>> '$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car
> >>> '$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car
> >>> '$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car
> >>> '$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car
> >>> '$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n)
> >>>
> >>> ====================
> >>>
> >>> Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant
> >>> with
> >>> an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens
> >>> such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other
> >>> hand,
> >>> maybe I can use that to store a list in a property.
> >>>
> >>> Edd
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> >>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> >>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carsten Dominik
> >> Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
> >> Universiteit van Amsterdam
> >> Kruislaan 403
> >> NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
> >> phone: +31 20 525 7477
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas
2007-10-23 15:06 ` Eddward DeVilla
@ 2007-11-01 8:36 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-03 0:37 ` Eddward DeVilla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-01 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eddward DeVilla; +Cc: org-mode list
On 23Oct2007, at 5:06 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
>>> ==========================
>>>
>>> Also, in the above example, the property values were aligned for me.
>>> In my previous example, that didn't happen. It seems that the
>>> alignment code does like underscores in names
>>>
>>> ===== sample ======
>>> * top
>>> :PROPERTIES:
>>> :fives: 0 8 16
>>> :d_5: 0
>>> :fours: 2 18 58
>>> :END:
Fixed, thanks.
>>>
>>> Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that
>>> I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with
>>> C-c
>>> '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs.
This is the same, @-I$2..$2 is the same as @-I$2..B&
The errors are caused by interpolations: you get something like
(car '2 18 58)
which is obvioulsly a bug. You need to enclose the properties in
parenthesis,
or supply the parenthesis in the formula, so that interpolation will
lead to
(car '(2 18 58))
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas
2007-11-01 8:36 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-11-03 0:37 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-11-05 18:20 ` Eddward DeVilla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-11-03 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode list
On 11/1/07, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that
> >>> I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with
> >>> C-c
> >>> '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs.
>
> This is the same, @-I$2..$2 is the same as @-I$2..B&
>
> The errors are caused by interpolations: you get something like
>
> (car '2 18 58)
>
> which is obvioulsly a bug. You need to enclose the properties in
> parenthesis,
> or supply the parenthesis in the formula, so that interpolation will
> lead to
>
> (car '(2 18 58))
Actually, that wasn't what I was seeing. In the table formula editor
it highlight the region represented by @-I$2..B& as though it were
@-I$2..$3. I'll have to see if I can put together a better recreate.
I have this happen on my machine at work, but it's not happening not
at home. Sorry.
Edd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas
2007-11-03 0:37 ` Eddward DeVilla
@ 2007-11-05 18:20 ` Eddward DeVilla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-11-05 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode list
On 11/2/07, Eddward DeVilla <eddward@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/1/07, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that
> > >>> I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with
> > >>> C-c
> > >>> '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs.
> >
> > This is the same, @-I$2..$2 is the same as @-I$2..B&
> >
> > The errors are caused by interpolations: you get something like
> >
> > (car '2 18 58)
> >
> > which is obvioulsly a bug. You need to enclose the properties in
> > parenthesis,
> > or supply the parenthesis in the formula, so that interpolation will
> > lead to
> >
> > (car '(2 18 58))
>
> Actually, that wasn't what I was seeing. In the table formula editor
> it highlight the region represented by @-I$2..B& as though it were
> @-I$2..$3. I'll have to see if I can put together a better recreate.
> I have this happen on my machine at work, but it's not happening not
> at home. Sorry.
OK. My fault. I had an old version of org at work. This has already
been fixed.
Edd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-05 18:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-18 22:06 property constants in elisp formulas Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-19 16:11 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-19 20:32 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-23 5:10 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-23 15:06 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-11-01 8:36 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-03 0:37 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-11-05 18:20 ` Eddward DeVilla
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).