Re: allow live execution of code snippets in html export

[Yehonathan Sharvit <viebel@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2012 bytes --]

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 at 19:55 Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> >> It might be worth investigating whether you can just run Klipse on <pre>
> >> blocks as that would potentially make it backward compatible.
> >> Potentially, an extension to Klipse that recognizes Org src blocks (in
> >> html) might be nice.
> >>
> > I think that should be pretty straighforward.
>
> Yeah, the link in Bastien's twitter post shows there's already a setting
> for it
>
>     <script type="text/javascript">window.klipse_settings = {selector:
> '.src-clojure'};</script>
>
> I don’t know if much more support is needed.  We add some automatic
> configuration scripting or add a per-block switch for enabling klipse.
>
> Two more little things. HTML blocks can't use the standard editor so they
> need an extra attribute `data-editor-style="html"`
>
> Also, Klipse supports including comma-separated external scripts to the
> execution environment with the `data-external-libs` attribute
>
> I have been using
> #+ATTR_HTML :code_attribs data-external-libs="http://
> jquery.org/jquery.js,./lib/01.js".  I'm doing it in tandem with the
> :tangle header, exporting previous code snippets and adding them to the
> execution environment as I go (just for fun).  I don't know if there's a
> better way to do this, potentially maybe trying to partially co-ordinate
> the execution environments for klipse and org so that executing code in org
> and in the html export gives similar results.  Seems a little ambitious.
>
> Also, it would be nice if klipse had an elisp REPL since so many org users
> blog about elisp.
>

​For that, one needs to find (or to write) an elisp evaluation in
javascript.​


>
>
>
> >> The Klipse license is GPL3.
> >>
> >
> > Is org GPL2 or GPL3? Are there any compatibility issues between the two?
>
> No, it was meant as a compliment of a sort.
>
>
> :-)
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6258 bytes --]