* org-schedule vs org-time-stamp
@ 2013-09-15 19:07 Paul Rudin
2013-09-15 19:38 ` Sebastien Vauban
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Rudin @ 2013-09-15 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
I'm not clear on how these two are intended to be used. The former
prefixes the timestamp with "SCHEDULED:" but I'm not sure what practical
consequences this has. Items appear in the agenda either way.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: org-schedule vs org-time-stamp
2013-09-15 19:07 org-schedule vs org-time-stamp Paul Rudin
@ 2013-09-15 19:38 ` Sebastien Vauban
2013-09-15 19:43 ` Paul Rudin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sebastien Vauban @ 2013-09-15 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
Paul Rudin,
Paul Rudin wrote:
> I'm not clear on how these two are intended to be used. The former
> prefixes the timestamp with "SCHEDULED:" but I'm not sure what practical
> consequences this has. Items appear in the agenda either way.
You should absolutely read the chapter 8 ("Dates and Times") of the Org
manual.
In summary, active timestamps only will appear on the day of the timestamp.
It's good for meetings or birthdays or events that naturally only occur at a
certain day.
SCHEDULED timestamps indicate when you want to start working on a task. Such
items will appear every day, on and on, in your agenda until you mark them
done.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: org-schedule vs org-time-stamp
2013-09-15 19:38 ` Sebastien Vauban
@ 2013-09-15 19:43 ` Paul Rudin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Rudin @ 2013-09-15 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
writes:
> Paul Rudin,
>
> Paul Rudin wrote:
>> I'm not clear on how these two are intended to be used. The former
>> prefixes the timestamp with "SCHEDULED:" but I'm not sure what practical
>> consequences this has. Items appear in the agenda either way.
>
> You should absolutely read the chapter 8 ("Dates and Times") of the Org
> manual.
>
> In summary, active timestamps only will appear on the day of the timestamp.
> It's good for meetings or birthdays or events that naturally only occur at a
> certain day.
>
> SCHEDULED timestamps indicate when you want to start working on a task. Such
> items will appear every day, on and on, in your agenda until you mark them
> done.
>
Ah yes, I see. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-15 19:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-15 19:07 org-schedule vs org-time-stamp Paul Rudin
2013-09-15 19:38 ` Sebastien Vauban
2013-09-15 19:43 ` Paul Rudin
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).