[ORG] [FEATURE] ob-js.el support :session for all existing JS packages

[ORG] [FEATURE] ob-js.el support :session for all existing JS packages

[numbchild]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1109 bytes --]

After add more code, not it supports `js-comint`, `skewer-mode`, `Indium`.

Waited many days, still no response. Anyone want to review this code?

Recently view Org-mode mailing list, many threads has response. Why my post
does not have any response?

[stardiviner]           <Hack this world!>      GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner                     Twitter:  @numbchild
Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36  CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433
Blog: http://stardiviner.github.io/

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 5:41 PM, numbchild@gmail.com <numbchild@gmail.com>
wrote:

> ​I pushed code at this branch:
> ​
> https://code.orgmode.org/stardiviner/org-mode/src/ob-js-skewer
>
> Hope someone can review it. and merge it.
> (I found https://code.orgmode.org/ does not have the create PR button
> now. Is it disabled?)
>
> [stardiviner]           <Hack this world!>      GPG key ID: 47C32433
> IRC(freeenode): stardiviner                     Twitter:  @numbchild
> Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36  CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433
> Blog: http://stardiviner.github.io/
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2499 bytes --]

Re: [ORG] [FEATURE] ob-js.el support :session for all existing JS packages

[Nick Dokos]

"numbchild@gmail.com" <numbchild@gmail.com> writes:

> After add more code, not it supports `js-comint`, `skewer-mode`, `Indium`.
>
> Waited many days, still no response. Anyone want to review this code?
>
> Recently view Org-mode mailing list, many threads has response. Why my post does not have any response?
>

Because reviewing code is hard: in this case, one needs some expertise
in org, but also in JS and its supporting packages in emacs. Speaking
for myself, I have some (rather rusty at this point) expertise in org,
but none in the other areas; I also have no time. I suspect that one
or more of these reasons are shared by most people on the list. The
wonder of it is that many questions *do* get answered, but in many
cases, they tend to be a short question-answer sequence. OTOH, there
are topics that go on for years with no resolution in sight despite
extended discussion. And there are certainly lots that fall by the
wayside.

So do not expect miracles, but if after a sufficient period of time,
things seem to have fallen into the cracks and forgotten, then a bump
might be warranted. But patience is a virtue!

-- 
Nick

Re: [ORG] [FEATURE] ob-js.el support :session for all existing JS packages

[stardiviner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1258 bytes --]

Aha, I see now. thanks for your answer. @Nick


On 03/13/2018 01:54 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> "numbchild@gmail.com" <numbchild@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> After add more code, not it supports `js-comint`, `skewer-mode`, `Indium`.
>>
>> Waited many days, still no response. Anyone want to review this code?
>>
>> Recently view Org-mode mailing list, many threads has response. Why my post does not have any response?
>>
> Because reviewing code is hard: in this case, one needs some expertise
> in org, but also in JS and its supporting packages in emacs. Speaking
> for myself, I have some (rather rusty at this point) expertise in org,
> but none in the other areas; I also have no time. I suspect that one
> or more of these reasons are shared by most people on the list. The
> wonder of it is that many questions *do* get answered, but in many
> cases, they tend to be a short question-answer sequence. OTOH, there
> are topics that go on for years with no resolution in sight despite
> extended discussion. And there are certainly lots that fall by the
> wayside.
>
> So do not expect miracles, but if after a sufficient period of time,
> things seem to have fallen into the cracks and forgotten, then a bump
> might be warranted. But patience is a virtue!
>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1981 bytes --]