From: Robert Klein <roklein@roklein.de>
To: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Org-mode exporters licensing
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:05:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150728090541.6cb2f617@pckr150.mpip-mainz.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873809v3l9.fsf@mbork.pl>
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:49:05 +0200
Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> wrote:
>
> On 2015-07-27, at 20:30, Daniele Nicolodi <daniele@grinta.net> wrote:
>
> > On 27/07/15 20:20, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2015-07-27, at 20:02, Daniele Nicolodi <daniele@grinta.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 27/07/15 19:42, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> >>>> That I've already learned. OTOH, one of the reasons to use PD
> >>>> might be that I explicitly state that I object the legal system
> >>>> I live in. (Mind you: I'm not an anarchist, and I'm very far
> >>>> from that. But this system is almost unbearable.)
> >>>
> >>> This statement confirms that you do not really understand what
> >>> you are talking about: as you cannot renounce your copy rights,
> >>> you cannot place something in the public domain. If you do not
> >>> release your work with an explicit license, the default copyright
> >>> protection law applies and this means (in all jurisdictions I
> >>> know about) that you reserve all rights to yourself: none can use
> >>> your code, and probably not even look at it.
> >>
> >> I do understand (at least I think so). And I do understand that my
> >> declaration of putting something in PD would be technically void.
> >> I just don't care about it, if the declaration of intent is clear.
> >
> > If you do not care about the terms in which who receives your work
> > is able to use it, why all the discussion?
> >
> > I thought that you were arguing that a less strict license than the
> > GPL is better for the content of a possible tutorial and you were
> > inquiring if you could release your code derived or inspired from
> > GPL code with another license. Now you say that you do not care, or
> > better you say that you do not want to give any rights to who
> > receives your code.
> >
> > I think you are confused.
>
> I was unclear again, sorry.
>
> 1. As for my planned tutorial: I am reconciled with the idea that it
> might have to be GPL'd. Though I still maintain that GPL is not an
> optimal license for such work.
>
> 2. As for other code I might write and publish: I'm tempted to use the
> Unlicense (which is basically more or less putting it into the PD),
> even though it might (technically) be void.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Daniele
FWIW, what Richard Lawrence posted in the other threat sounds good.
Please feel free to use my material I posted to the list
(see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2015-06/msg00160.html)
I mostly copied the export function in the example from org-mode, but
the rest you may use as you like.
Best regards
Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-28 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 8:06 Org-mode exporters licensing Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 8:16 ` Rasmus
2015-07-27 8:26 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 8:35 ` Rasmus
2015-07-27 9:05 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 9:46 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-07-27 11:50 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 8:42 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-07-27 8:59 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 9:31 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-07-27 11:52 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 12:17 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 12:42 ` Greg Troxel
2015-07-27 12:52 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 17:45 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-08-02 16:54 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-07-27 17:44 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 17:42 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 18:02 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 18:20 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 18:30 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 18:49 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-28 7:05 ` Robert Klein [this message]
2015-07-27 12:06 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-07-27 12:27 ` Rasmus
2015-07-27 12:25 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-07-27 12:50 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 17:47 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 17:10 ` Achim Gratz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150728090541.6cb2f617@pckr150.mpip-mainz.mpg.de \
--to=roklein@roklein.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=mbork@mbork.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).