* Nick Dokos: Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile
@ 2009-05-04 16:41 Nick Dokos
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nick Dokos @ 2009-05-04 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
[D'oh: I replied to Carsten only - sorry about that.]
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 16:27:15 -0400
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Make
file
Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> > is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
> > emacs
> > -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
>
> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
> am not even sure about Emacs 22.
>
emacs-22 groks -Q (or in long form: --no-init-file --no-site-file
- --no-splash). xemacs21[1] seems to use long form options with a single
dash: -no-init-file (== -q) and -no-site-file.
The thing is that (with git) it's easy to make such changes locally,
while waiting (perhaps for ever !-) for upstream: have a local branch
with a few changes that are specific to the local setup and rebase
after a pull.
Nick
[1] According to an online manpage: http://linux.die.net/man/1/xemacs
------- End of Forwarded Message
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-05-04 16:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-04 16:41 Nick Dokos: Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile Nick Dokos
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).