[PATCH] devel/release-checks.sh: made python version check work with python 3

[PATCH] devel/release-checks.sh: made python version check work with python 3

[Tomi Ollila]

This trivial change consists of just putting print() argument in
parentheses.
---
 devel/release-checks.sh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/devel/release-checks.sh b/devel/release-checks.sh
index efd0b3441f2e..bf0d68a444b6 100755
--- a/devel/release-checks.sh
+++ b/devel/release-checks.sh
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ else
 fi
 
 echo -n "Checking that python bindings version is $VERSION... "
-py_version=`python -c "with open('$PV_FILE') as vf: exec(vf.read()); print __VERSION__"`
+py_version=`python -c "with open('$PV_FILE') as vf: exec(vf.read()); print(__VERSION__)"`
 if [ "$py_version" = "$VERSION" ]
 then
 	echo Yes.
-- 
2.0.0

[PATCH] devel/release-checks: added checking of copyright year in documentation

[Tomi Ollila]

Check that copyright year will be current year in generated documentation.

The checking is done my matching that copyright line contains current
year as a substring which is good enough "approximation" in this context.
---
 devel/release-checks.sh | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/devel/release-checks.sh b/devel/release-checks.sh
index bf0d68a444b6..b655a5089e12 100755
--- a/devel/release-checks.sh
+++ b/devel/release-checks.sh
@@ -207,6 +207,18 @@ case $news_date in
 	append_emsg "Date '$news_date' in NEWS file is not in format (yyyy-mm-dd)"
 esac
 
+year=`exec date +%Y`
+echo -n "Checking that copyright line in documentation contains $year... "
+copyrightline=`exec python -c "__file__ = 'command-line'
+with open('doc/conf.py') as cf: exec(cf.read()); print(copyright)"`
+case $copyrightline in
+	*$year*)
+		echo Yes. ;;
+	*)
+		echo No.
+		append_emsg "The copyright in doc/conf.py line '$copyrightline' does not contain '$year'"
+esac
+
 if [ -n "$emsgs" ]
 then
 	echo
-- 
2.0.0

Re: [PATCH] devel/release-checks.sh: made python version check work with python 3

[David Bremner]

Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:

> This trivial change consists of just putting print() argument in
> parentheses.

Pushed. BTW, would it be a good thing or a bad one to take the python
binary name here from sh.config? Or just not worth the trouble?

d

Re: [PATCH] devel/release-checks.sh: made python version check work with python 3

[Tomi Ollila]

On Tue, Aug 04 2015, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:

> Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:
>
>> This trivial change consists of just putting print() argument in
>> parentheses.
>
> Pushed.

Thanks.

> BTW, would it be a good thing or a bad one to take the python
> binary name here from sh.config? Or just not worth the trouble?

I'd say that unless there ever is problem with binary name `python` to make
those checks to succeed then we could think whether to depend on sh.config
existing... or do the same way resolving python as configure does.

> d

Tomi

Re: [PATCH] devel/release-checks.sh: made python version check work with python 3

[David Bremner]

Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:

>
> I'd say that unless there ever is problem with binary name `python` to make
> those checks to succeed then we could think whether to depend on sh.config
> existing... or do the same way resolving python as configure does.
>

OK, for now, since there is a very small group of users for
release-checks.sh, let's wait for the hardcoded binary name to cause
problems for someone.

d

Re: [PATCH] devel/release-checks: added checking of copyright year in documentation

[David Bremner]

Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:

> +copyrightline=`exec python -c "__file__ = 'command-line'
> +with open('doc/conf.py') as cf: exec(cf.read()); print(copyright)"`

That took me several tries to understand what is going on. Perhaps
that's because patch-review time co-incides with first coffee of the
day, but could you explain it in a comment or something, just in case
it's not only me who finds it confusing.

d