From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: plans for 0.12
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:52:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fwdk42ai.fsf@praet.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8762eo2b89.fsf@zancas.localnet>
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
> >
> > Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any
> > test coverage yet. Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ?
> > (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely asking for opinions)
> >
>
> Hi Pieter;
>
> My initial answer is probably not. I see the tests as mainly useful
> during development, for detecting regressions. I think most people doing
> development will be working from git, rather than the distribution
> tarballs we ship.
>
> On the other hand, adding tests is also not that risky, so if the
> concensus is strongly in favour of integrating them pre 0.12, and
> somebody wants to review them all, then I'm willing to consider it.
>
Fair enough.
Just in case anyone considers them beneficial and/or is willing to
review (whether it be for inclusion in 0.12 or later), I've gotten
rid of the merge conflict by moving the last test to a new file
called `emacs-search' [1] (also see [2]). Other than that, it
remains unchanged.
> d
Peace
--
Pieter
[1] id:"1331149792-17192-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"
[2] id:"87aa47euao.fsf@praet.org"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-25 14:27 plans for 0.12 David Bremner
2012-02-26 8:11 ` Mark Walters
2012-02-26 23:56 ` Jameson Graef Rollins
2012-03-01 21:21 ` Pieter Praet
2012-03-01 22:43 ` David Bremner
2012-03-07 19:52 ` Pieter Praet [this message]
2012-03-14 11:21 ` David Bremner
2012-03-01 21:44 ` [PATCH] NEWS: add entry for `notmuch-show-stash-mlarchive-link{, -and-go}' Pieter Praet
2012-03-02 13:03 ` David Bremner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fwdk42ai.fsf@praet.org \
--to=pieter@praet.org \
--cc=david@tethera.net \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).