unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/cli: pass GMIME_ENABLE_RFC2047_WORKAROUNDS to g_mime_init()
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:35:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130910223553.GI1426@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522F73A4.90802@fifthhorseman.net>

Quoth Daniel Kahn Gillmor on Sep 10 at  3:31 pm:
> On 09/10/2013 02:51 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > As explained by Jeffrey Stedfast, the author of GMime, quoted in [1]:
> > 
> >> Passing the GMIME_ENABLE_RFC2047_WORKAROUNDS flag to g_mime_init()
> >> *should* solve the decoding problem mentioned in the thread. This
> >> flag should be safe to pass into g_mime_init() without any bad side
> >> effects and my unit tests do test that code-path.
> 
> the result of doing this is that there will become legitimately-crafted
> subject lines that are now unrepresentable.
> 
> I'm always leery of trying to improve support for data that doesn't
> follow the standards at the expense of data that *does* follow the
> standards.
> 
> 	--dkg

I haven't looked at exactly what workarounds this enables, but if it's
what I'm guessing (RFC 2047 escapes in the middle of RFC 2822 text
tokens), are there really subject lines that this will misinterpret
that weren't obviously crafted to break the workaround?  The RFC 2047
escape sequence was deliberately designed to be obscure, since RFC
2047 itself caused previously "standards-compliant" subject lines to
potentially be interpreted differently.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-10 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-10 18:51 [PATCH] lib/cli: pass GMIME_ENABLE_RFC2047_WORKAROUNDS to g_mime_init() Jani Nikula
2013-09-10 19:31 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2013-09-10 22:35   ` Austin Clements [this message]
2013-09-10 22:50     ` [PATCH] lib/cli: pass GMIME_ENABLE_RFC2047_WORKAROUNDS to g_mime_init() a test Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2013-09-11  1:51       ` Austin Clements
2013-09-11 18:21       ` Jani Nikula
2013-09-11  2:02 ` [PATCH] lib/cli: pass GMIME_ENABLE_RFC2047_WORKAROUNDS to g_mime_init() Austin Clements
2013-09-11 17:36   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] test: add known broken tests for known broken RFC 2047 encodings Jani Nikula
2013-09-11 17:36     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/cli: pass GMIME_ENABLE_RFC2047_WORKAROUNDS to g_mime_init() Jani Nikula
2013-09-11 18:37     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] test: add known broken tests for known broken RFC 2047 encodings Austin Clements
2013-09-11 19:57     ` Tomi Ollila
2013-09-14 17:21     ` David Bremner
2013-09-11 17:40   ` [PATCH] lib/cli: pass GMIME_ENABLE_RFC2047_WORKAROUNDS to g_mime_init() Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://notmuchmail.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130910223553.GI1426@mit.edu \
    --to=amdragon@mit.edu \
    --cc=dkg@fifthhorseman.net \
    --cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).