unofficial mirror of meta@public-inbox.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: ActivityPub <=> email bridge?
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 01:49:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190330014915.o2hw333fjotxkrjy@dcvr> (raw)

Is it worth the effort?

Something tells me that if ActivityPub reaches high-enough
adoption levels; it'll have to deal with a spam problem that
email folks have been dealing with for decades, too.

So ActivityPub seems like a duplicated effort as far as it's use
for messaging for software development goes...

             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-30  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-30  1:49 Eric Wong [this message]
2023-03-07 22:12 ` ActivityPub <=> email bridge? Eric Wong
2023-03-07 22:17   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-03-07 22:25     ` Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://public-inbox.org/README

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190330014915.o2hw333fjotxkrjy@dcvr \
    --to=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=meta@public-inbox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).