From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@80x24.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN:  
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA66020248;
	Sat, 30 Mar 2019 01:49:15 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 01:49:15 +0000
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: ActivityPub <=> email bridge?
Message-ID: <20190330014915.o2hw333fjotxkrjy@dcvr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Is it worth the effort?

Something tells me that if ActivityPub reaches high-enough
adoption levels; it'll have to deal with a spam problem that
email folks have been dealing with for decades, too.

So ActivityPub seems like a duplicated effort as far as it's use
for messaging for software development goes...