unofficial mirror of gwl-devel@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@ist.tugraz.at>
Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Processing large amounts of files
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:03:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877chvehuu.fsf@elephly.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2010bdb88116d64da3650b06e58979518b2c7277.camel@ist.tugraz.at>


Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@ist.tugraz.at> writes:

> For comparison:
>   time cat /tmp/meow/{0..7769}
>   […]
>   
>   real	0m0,144s
>   user	0m0,049s
>   sys	0m0,094s
>
> It takes GWL 6 times longer to compute the workflow than to create the
> inputs in Guile, and 600 times longer than to actually execute the
> shell command.  I think there is room for improvement :)

GWL checks if all input files exist before running the command.  Part of
the difference you see here (takes about 2 seconds on my laptop) is GWL
running FILE-EXISTS? on 7769 files.  This happens in prepare-inputs; its
purpose:

  "Ensure that all files in the INPUTS-MAP alist exist and are linked to
  the expected locations.  Pick unspecified inputs from the environment.
  Return either the INPUTS-MAP alist with any additionally used input
  file names added, or raise a condition containing the list of missing
  files."

Another significant delay is introduced by the cache mechanism, which
computes a unique prefix based on the contents of all input files.  It's
not unexpected that this will take a little while, but it's not great
either.

The rest of the time is lost in inferior package lookups and in using
Guix to build a script that likely already exists.  The latter is
something that we could cache (given identical output of "guix describe"
we could skip the computation of the process scripts).

-- 
Ricardo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-21 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2010bdb88116d64da3650b06e58979518b2c7277.camel@ist.tugraz.at>
2024-03-21 14:34 ` Processing large amounts of files Ricardo Wurmus
2024-03-25  7:42   ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-03-25  9:25     ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-03-25 10:42       ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-03-21 15:03 ` Ricardo Wurmus [this message]
2024-03-21 15:33   ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-03-26 21:30   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-03-27  7:10     ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-03-27  9:58       ` Ricardo Wurmus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.guixwl.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877chvehuu.fsf@elephly.net \
    --to=rekado@elephly.net \
    --cc=gwl-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=liliana.prikler@ist.tugraz.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).