Architecture support [was: Re: Merging core-updates?]

[Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1081 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:43:17AM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Well, it could be helpful is Berlin or Bordeaux could build some
> manifest of core-updates (not necessary the whole core-updates).  And
> then, once the manifest builds, we could add some packages and repeat.
> 
> It would avoid that we all build the same things; worse, that each of us
> burn many CPU just for knowing it fails.
> 
> Chris, Mathieu?  What do you think?
> 

At least locally I try to build out to hello, and then to mesa.

Currently I believe only x86_64 is building to hello. I'm not against
downgrading file to an earlier version if it'll get i686 to get to
hello.

i686 is getting stuck at an unknown file.
Aarch64 and armhf are getting stuck at gcc-cross-boot0.
Riscv64 is getting stuck at gcc-final.
I haven't tested powerpc64le (or powerpc or mips64el).

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]