all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "\( via Guix-patches" via <guix-patches@gnu.org>
To: "Philip McGrath" <philip@philipmcgrath.com>,
	"Maxime Devos" <maximedevos@telenet.be>, <55998@debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: [bug#55998] [PATCH] gnu: Add cctools.
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 22:20:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CKR0TCX37H8E.3F7YYLX34VEDI@guix-aspire> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0de6f5e5-c58b-354f-3ee0-18e824b7779a@philipmcgrath.com>

On Wed Jun 15, 2022 at 10:00 PM BST, Philip McGrath wrote:
> According to 
> <https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html#legal-details>, "It is 
> acceptable for a free license to specify which jurisdiction's law 
> applies, or where litigation must be done, or both."

Although I don't know anything about licensing, wouldn't this mean a
company could, for example, publish software under a license that states
that disputes must be resolved in some theoretical country that bans all
free sharing of software (even if the owner wants to share it), then sue
somebody who's modified the ostensibly free software for copyright
infringement, winning because the country forbids any software sharing,
and still have the license count as free?

I'm probably misunderstanding this; surely there wouldn't be such a
gaping hole in the FSF's free license definition?




  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15 17:15 [bug#55998] [PATCH] gnu: Add cctools Philip McGrath
2022-06-15 18:32 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-15 18:45 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-15 19:06   ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-15 19:35     ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-15 21:00       ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-15 21:11         ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-15 21:20         ` ( via Guix-patches via [this message]
2022-06-15 18:53 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-15 19:19   ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-15 20:07     ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-17 11:28       ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-15 18:55 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-15 19:34   ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-15 18:56 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-15 19:21   ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-15 19:23     ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-17 11:19       ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-15 20:04 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-17 11:09   ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-19 21:01   ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-06-15 20:17 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-16 22:29   ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-17  6:14     ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-15 20:18 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-15 20:23 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-16 23:29   ` Philip McGrath
2022-06-17 11:51 ` [bug#55998] [PATCH v2] " Philip McGrath
2022-06-19 21:02   ` bug#55998: [PATCH] " Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CKR0TCX37H8E.3F7YYLX34VEDI@guix-aspire \
    --to=guix-patches@gnu.org \
    --cc=55998@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=maximedevos@telenet.be \
    --cc=paren@disroot.org \
    --cc=philip@philipmcgrath.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.