From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Profiles/manifests-related command line interface enhancements
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 17:35:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9rxx8ri.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m18souet41.fsf@khs-macbook.home> (Konrad Hinsen's message of "Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:26:38 +0100")
Hey!
Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net> skribis:
> Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:
>
>> I'm actually surprised you find it surprising! :)
>> I can think of Simon, maybe Konrad(?) and myself who mentioned it
>> before.
>
> Yes, me too. I could add to Pierre's list of use cases, but I prefer to
> shift the discussion to a higher level.
Just to be clear: I think supporting multiple ‘--manifest’ flags in all
the commands would be welcome. It’s probably a rather simple change,
and if it’s useful, go for it!
> What we have been discussing here recently is the organization of
> software one level above packages. The vague idea is "groups of packages
> that go together". Outside of the Guix universe, this is the realm of
> (Docker) containers. A quick look at what happens in that universe
> shows that composing such groups of packages corresponds to a frequent
> need (see docker compose, Kubernetes, ...).
Yes, I see.
> In Guix we have ephemeral (environment) vs. persistent (profile), ad-hoc
> (package -i, environment from package lists, ...) and declarative
> (manifests). It's a bit of a mess. Hacks such as "environment -r" show
> that we ought to think about a better overall design. In addition to the
> two dimensions I mentioned, this should include shareable/re-usable
> vs. personal. People publish and share Docker images, so why wouldn't
> they publish and share Guix super-packages? This third dimension also
> raises the question of where the information (profiles, manifests, ...)
> are stored and managed (version control?), and how they are referred to
> (name, filename, ...). And of course how they are composed - in Guile,
> at the shell level, or yet something else?
I think having ephemeral + persistent and declarative + imperative is
cool—I’d call that “flexible” rather than “messy”. :-)
It’s great to have “guix install” as an entry point; I’m sure it allows
us to reach out to more people, and that matters too. (I actually use
it, BTW, so it’s not an expert vs. newbie thing!)
I agree that sharing and publishing is important, and I think manifests
support that. I think we need to support “unions” of manifests, and
that means (as always) supporting it at the API level and at the
command-line level (allowing for multiple ‘--manifest’ flags).
What we’re now saying is “look, you can write a manifest, and then you
can have it under version-control and publish it and it’s all up to you
how you do that”; but you seem to suggest that we should offer a
higher-level, more integrated solution, is that correct?
Like, we would enforce certain conventions by default, perhaps have
direct Git integration so that one can refer to a “manifest” just like
they refer to a channel, things like that. Do I get it right?
I haven’t thought much about this but that sounds like an exciting
direction!
Thanks,
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-06 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-23 16:37 Profiles/manifests-related command line interface enhancements Pierre Neidhardt
2019-10-24 9:00 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-10-24 9:32 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-10-24 16:28 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-10-24 16:42 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2019-10-24 18:16 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-10-24 19:23 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-10-24 20:04 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-10-24 21:35 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-10-25 9:29 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-10-31 11:38 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-11-03 14:18 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-04 10:39 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-11-04 11:06 ` zimoun
2019-11-05 6:26 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-05 8:35 ` Hartmut Goebel
2019-11-05 9:03 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-05 9:09 ` Hartmut Goebel
2019-11-05 9:22 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-11-05 15:36 ` zimoun
2019-11-05 16:05 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-06 12:09 ` zimoun
2019-11-07 13:07 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-06 17:07 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-06 22:21 ` Bengt Richter
2019-11-07 13:52 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-06 16:35 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2019-11-07 7:46 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-07 9:04 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-11-07 11:14 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-07 11:36 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-11-09 17:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-10 9:36 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-11 15:56 ` A better XML, config is code (was Re: Profiles/manifests-related command line...) Giovanni Biscuolo
2019-11-13 15:28 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-12 8:55 ` Profiles/manifests-related command line interface enhancements Andy Wingo
2019-11-12 20:07 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-13 20:58 ` Bengt Richter
2019-11-16 22:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-17 10:44 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-18 14:25 ` zimoun
2019-11-19 10:24 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-23 17:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-25 11:06 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-26 9:51 ` On DSLs Ludovic Courtès
2019-12-02 19:05 ` zimoun
2019-12-02 19:11 ` Julien Lepiller
2019-12-03 10:19 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-12-03 14:12 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-12-03 15:46 ` zimoun
2019-12-04 6:33 ` Bengt Richter
2019-12-10 16:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-12-08 8:48 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-12-03 10:26 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-12-03 12:00 ` zimoun
2019-11-11 14:13 ` Profiles/manifests-related command line interface enhancements Hartmut Goebel
2019-11-16 22:27 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-17 11:30 ` Konrad Hinsen
2019-11-18 14:40 ` zimoun
2019-12-22 19:40 ` Andreas Enge
2019-12-22 20:39 ` Pjotr Prins
2019-11-18 14:15 ` zimoun
2019-11-26 9:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-06 16:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-07 12:57 ` zimoun
2019-11-17 10:35 ` Package inputs in manifests Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-17 23:11 ` Bengt Richter
2019-11-18 17:14 ` zimoun
2019-11-23 14:05 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-11-24 5:49 ` Bengt Richter
2019-11-24 7:17 ` Timothy Sample
2019-11-25 3:42 ` Bengt Richter
2019-11-18 16:18 ` zimoun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9rxx8ri.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.