From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3.
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 11:01:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8h2vpdq.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ild3yltb.fsf@cbaines.net> (Christopher Baines's message of "Mon, 08 May 2023 13:56:42 +0100")
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:
>>
>>> guix-commits@gnu.org writes:
>>>
>>>> apteryx pushed a commit to branch master
>>>> in repository guix.
>>>>
>>>> commit 0be7838105806819f4586ec9130382a66a22880e
>>>> Author: Kaelyn Takata <kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com>
>>>> AuthorDate: Thu May 4 20:12:46 2023 +0000
>>>>
>>>> gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3.
>>>>
>>>> * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Update to 23.0.3.
>>>> [source]: Remove obsolete patch and update HTTPS url.
>>>> [arguments]: Enable the crocus gallium driver.
>>>> * gnu/packages/patches/mesa-fix-sporadic-test-failures.patch: Delete file.
>>>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it.
>>>> ---
>>>> gnu/local.mk | 1 -
>>>> gnu/packages/gl.scm | 14 ++++-------
>>>> .../patches/mesa-fix-sporadic-test-failures.patch | 27 ----------------------
>>>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> → guix refresh -l mesa
>>> Building the following 1954 packages would ensure 4257 dependent
>>> packages are rebuilt ...
>>>
>>>
>>> I know there's been some discussion about changing processes regarding
>>> changes like this that impact lots of packages, but as far as I'm aware,
>>> the documented process hasn't changed yet. So should this have gone to
>>> core-updates, and not been directly pushed to master?
>>
>> There isn't currently a core-updates branch, and I need to spend some
>> time documenting the authorization process for how to create short lived
>> Cuirass branches. I think ideally we would have created a
>> 'graphics-team' or similar branch (even the team has yet to be formed)
>> and let it build.
>>
>> Seeing the build machines were idling in the European night, I figured I
>> could get away with it for this time.
>
> Some build machines may have been idle, but I'm not sure what you mean
> by "get away with it"?
I meant that I believed there was enough capacity to process the 4K
rebuilds (per architecture) in a way that wouldn't negatively affect
users too much.
> While the berlin bulid farm has managed to catch back up for
> x86_64-linux and i686-linux within 24 hours, I think these changes
> impact other systems as well.
>
> Also, the bordeaux build farm has a lot fewer machines to do these
> builds, so while the substitute availability had caught up (and
> surpassed ci.guix.gnu.org for x86_64-linux) prior to these changes, it's
> going to be several days at least I think before substitute availability
> is looking good again.
>
> I was watching the substitute availability recover after the
> core-updates merge as I'd like to re-enable testing patches on the
> qa-frontpage, but now that'll have to wait some more for all these new
> builds to complete.
Hm, sorry about that. Cuirass seems to have mostly caught up already
(was 64% before, 62% now for the master specification).
>> But the situation will repeat; I'd like to push some xorg updates that
>> fix a CVE; we'll nead a 'xorg-team' branch or similar. Should we create
>> these branches from the maintenance repository (permanent branches) ?
>
> I don't really understand the question, surely the branches would be in
> the guix Git repository?
Yes, the branch would be in the Guix repository, but I meant regarding
the Cuirass specifications affecting which branches it builds; sorry for
being unclear.
> Anyway, package replacements+grafts can be used for security issues so
> that shouldn't need to be on a branch as it won't involve lots of
> rebuilds.
For this case I think so yes, since it's a patch-level update that
should be safe.
> When it comes to handling changes involving lots of rebuilds though, I
> think that this has been and continues to be difficult, but in my mind
> that's a reason to slow down and try and work on tooling and processes
> to help.
One of the things that has been bothered me has been the lack of
documentation/tooling to recreate TLS user certificates for Cuirass so
that I can configure branches via its web interface again, or retry
failed builds. I'm currently working on documenting (in Cuirass's
manual) a script Ricardo's made for that task.
But building lots of packages will still require a lot of processing
power, probably more so when it happens in focused team branches
compared to grouped together as it used to be the case for
e.g. core-updates.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-08 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <168347913021.32190.10808857919894440138@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <20230507170531.26A00C22F14@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org>
2023-05-08 1:41 ` 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3 Christopher Baines
2023-05-08 12:08 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-05-08 12:56 ` Christopher Baines
2023-05-08 15:01 ` Maxim Cournoyer [this message]
2023-05-08 16:33 ` Feature branches (was: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3) Andreas Enge
2023-05-08 17:01 ` Feature branches Maxim Cournoyer
2023-05-10 9:21 ` Andreas Enge
2023-05-10 13:23 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-05-10 13:40 ` Andreas Enge
2023-05-10 13:55 ` Andreas Enge
2023-05-11 4:49 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-05-08 17:15 ` Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-05-10 9:11 ` Andreas Enge
2023-05-10 11:30 ` Christopher Baines
2023-05-08 16:39 ` 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3 Christopher Baines
2023-05-09 4:37 ` John Kehayias
2023-05-09 8:39 ` Christopher Baines
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v8h2vpdq.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=mail@cbaines.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.