Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade

[ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)]

Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-28 16:01 +0300) wrote:

[...]

>> --- a/guix/scripts.scm
>> +++ b/guix/scripts.scm
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>    #:use-module (guix utils)
>>    #:use-module (guix ui)
>>    #:use-module (guix store)
>> +  #:use-module (guix grafts)
>>    #:use-module (guix monads)
>>    #:use-module (guix packages)
>>    #:use-module (guix derivations)
>> @@ -105,11 +106,14 @@ true."
>>                          #:rest build-options)
>>    "Build PACKAGE using BUILD-OPTIONS acceptable by 'set-build-options'.
>>  Show what and how will/would be built."
>> -  (mbegin %store-monad
>> +  (mlet %store-monad ((grafting? ((lift0 %graft? %store-monad))))
>>      (apply set-build-options*
>>             #:use-substitutes? use-substitutes?
>>             (strip-keyword-arguments '(#:dry-run?) build-options))
>> -    (mlet %store-monad ((derivation (package->derivation package)))
>> +    (mlet %store-monad ((derivation (package->derivation package
>> +                                                         #:graft?
>> +                                                         (and (not dry-run?)
>> +                                                              grafting?))))
>>        (mbegin %store-monad
>>          (maybe-build (list derivation)
>>                       #:use-substitutes? use-substitutes?
>>
>> Using #:graft? is cleaner anyway.
>
> Indeed!  Since you said it's OK to make separate patches for this
> "dry-run + no-grafts" change (for CLI and Emacs UI), I committed it as
> a82a201.

Perfect, thanks!

Ludo’.