Re: Rename glibc-utf8-locales to glibc-limited-utf8-locales

[Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>]

Hi Rovanion,

Rovanion Luckey <rovanion.luckey@gmail.com> writes:

> I prefer names to not be lying about what they are, despite any
> documentation. It is a UX problem if the user has to search the
> documentation for any given package name before installing it, just to make
> sure that it contains what it says on the can so to speak.
>
> The name glibc-utf8-locales when contrasted with glibc-locales reads to me
> like "it contains only the utf8-locales".

The package description reads as:

   This package provides a small sample of UTF-8 locales mostly useful
   in test environments.

Perhaps it should simply be marked as a hidden package (not discoverable
via the user interface), and not mentioned in the manual at all.

What do you think?

Thanks,

Maxim