bug#28694: gnu: p11-kit: Update to 0.23.9 fails test.

[Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com>]

Hello Ludovic,

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Hi Oleg,
>
> Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Do the failures happen reproducibly for you?  Is there a test log or
>>> code giving a hint as to what is being tested and how it fails?
>>
>> I attached one log in the first message, but here is another one.
>>
>> I'm on 46cf31868c1b12eec50bc9b8dda64604dd81f986
>
> [...]
>
>> calling secure_getenv(BLAH) getenv(BLAH) = 5
>> calling secure_getenv(BLAH) getenv(BLAH) = 5
>> 1..4
>> ok 1 /compat/strndup
>> not ok 2 /compat/getauxval
>> # assertion failed (ret != 0): (0 != 0)
>> # in test_getauxval() at test-compat.c:79
>> not ok 3 /compat/secure_getenv
>> # assertion failed (ret == 0): (5 == 0)
>> # in test_secure_getenv() at test-compat.c:104
>> ok 4 /compat/mmap
>> FAIL: test-compat
>
> [...]
>
>> ok 1 /conf/test_parse_conf_1
>> ok 2 /conf/test_parse_ignore_missing
>> ok 3 /conf/test_parse_fail_missing
>> ok 4 /conf/test_merge_defaults
>> ok 5 /conf/test_load_globals_merge
>> ok 6 /conf/test_load_globals_no_user
>> ok 7 /conf/test_load_globals_system_sets_only
>> ok 8 /conf/test_load_globals_user_sets_only
>> ok 9 /conf/test_load_globals_system_sets_invalid
>> ok 10 /conf/test_load_globals_user_sets_invalid
>> ok 11 /conf/test_load_modules_merge
>> ok 12 /conf/test_load_modules_no_user
>> ok 13 /conf/test_load_modules_user_only
>> ok 14 /conf/test_load_modules_user_none
>> ok 15 /conf/test_parse_boolean
>> not ok 16 /conf/setuid
>> # assertion failed (ret == 18): (33 == 18)
>> # in test_setuid() at test-conf.c:421
>> FAIL: test-conf
>
> Both failures have to do with setuid/setgid binaries.
>
> Is there anything special about your system, like use of SELinux or
> similar?  What are the mount options on /tmp?  What kernel do you use?

No, I use pretty much default GNU GuixSD.

    No SELinux or similar.

My mount options on /tmp are:

    $ findmnt /tmp
    /tmp   tmpfs  tmpfs  rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=16777216k

    (file-systems (cons* ;; …
                         (file-system
                           (device "tmpfs")
                           (mount-point "/tmp")
                           (type "tmpfs")
                           (flags '(no-suid no-dev))
                           (options "mode=1777,size=16G")
                           (needed-for-boot? #t)
                           (check? #f))
                         %base-file-systems))

Yes, there is a nosuid flag.  After removing this, success to build.
/me fills stupid.

Could we have a thing which will check for such flag before running
tests in package builds?  Or tell this after 'guix system reconfigure'.
Or maybe to mention in Guix documentation if such a flag present then
you could fail to build some packages?

    $ uname -a
    Linux magnolia 4.13.4-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[...]

Thanks,
Oleg.