all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Package input loop detection
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:03:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87po57u3io.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fu66kyxn.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:30:44 +0100")

Hello!

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

>> I've had this issue for a while now, while adding some packages, I'll
>> create a loop in the package graph, which causes Guix to just loop
>> infinitely when trying to generate derivations.
>
> this is a great initiative.  I’ve been having this issue in the past as
> well, and I’d really like Guix to be a little smarter about it.

+1

>> I'm not particularly fond of the implementation, because the
>> package-derivation function is called from expand-input called from
>> bag->derivation, the information about the part of the graph that has
>> been traversed is passed through each function.
>>
>> The seen-package-list argument could be removed, but the ordering
>> information is really useful when printing out the error message. I
>> think it should be still possible to generate this after finding the
>> issue by searching through the graph of packages, which would allow
>> removing this one argument.
>>
>> One other thought I had is that this could be extracted to something in
>> guix lint, which would at least allow finding these problems, without
>> touching the core derivation related code.
>
> I’d be in favour of keeping it out of the core and stash it away in a
> separate tool.  Not sure if that should be “guix lint” (what about “guix
> graph”?), but I would prefer that over having the code run all the time.

I’d be in favor of keeping it in the core, like Chris did, provided the
code is not too complex and provided there’s no significant performance
penalty.  That way, problems would always be gracefully handled.

I’ll take a look at Chris’ code soonish.

Thanks!

Ludo’.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-14 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-05 16:42 Package input loop detection Christopher Baines
2018-02-12 15:30 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-02-12 18:48   ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-02-12 19:04   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-02-14 13:03   ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2018-04-18  8:58     ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-04-23 16:07 ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87po57u3io.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rekado@elephly.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.