all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com>
To: Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: A Joyous Core-Updates Week-End 🎉
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 00:59:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fs9255b6.fsf@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fs96ukro.fsf@jpoiret.xyz>

Hi Guix,

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:16 AM, Josselin Poiret wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> It's that time of the year again!  Merging core-updates!  Do you *want*
> glibc 2.35, gcc 11 as default, mesa 22, python 3.10, and more?!  Here's
> your chance!
>

Time flies! Big thanks to Andreas especially for really shepherding (no pun intended) us
to an already good state.

> What is core-updates you ask?  It's the big branch where all changes
> that affect significant parts of the dependency graph are pushed, to
> avoid world rebuilds, and also to test them out.  This branch is then
> merged back into the main one periodically, and of course, this is never
> painless, as upgrading important dependencies like glibc or gcc are
> going to cause issues.  Note that this workflow might change in the near
> future though, see [1].
>
> Some people have been hard at work fixing most of the build issues, and
> we have most of the big changes sorted out now.  However, it's
> impossible for the usual suspects to cover every single package, so we
> would like to ask the wider community for their help with the merge.
> Anyone can help, and in various ways (you don't need to know how to code
> in Guile!).
>
> This week-end (15–16 April), let's get everyone together and work on
> core-updates!  Here's what you can do to help:
>

Thanks for organizing! I know many are in Europe (US here) so I may miss a lot of people
due to time zone/schedule, but looking forward to helping out. I've been away from Guix a
bit due to some other stuff but hope to put my eyes for review and commit access to good
use to help out with everyone's hard work.

>
> 1) Use `guix time-machine` to test out your packages.
>
> If you have a package manifest lying around (you can get one out of your
> profile by using `guix package --export-manifest`), you can see which
> packages are available by doing `guix time-machine --branch=core-updates
> -- weather -m MANIFEST.SCM`!
>
> You can also test the packages themselves by doing `guix time-machine
> --branch=core-updates -- shell YOUR-PACKAGE`, at which point you'll be
> in a shell with the new package available.  You can then try it out to
> see if it works properly!
>

I also want to stress this point, more testing of your favorite package (or reconfiguring
your system to core-updates if you are feeling more adventurous) is really helpful. So
don't be afraid even if you have no idea what's happening under the hood.

>
> 2) Hack on `core-updates`.
>
> This is better to do beforehand: add a new worktree for core-updates
> (you don't want to prune all of the .go files when switching between
> master and core-updates, don't you?) using `git worktree add
> ../core-updates/ core-updates`.
>
> You can then enter that directory and follow the instructions from the
> manual, at "(guix)Building from Git".  You will have a checkout ready to
> work on core-updates!  You can then try to build your manifest from the
> checkout and see if everything builds, and try fixing the ones that
> don't.
>
>
> 3) Hang out on #guix and on the MLs.
>
> Follow what fellow members of the community are doing and struggling
> with, cheer them on and/or offer them your assistance!  Feel free to
> reply to this if you have any questions about the process, or with your
> attempts, struggles and successes!
>

Question on procedure: are we going to be posting every patch to guix-patches and waiting
for QA to build? Or only for not trivial (whatever that means) patches? I guess I'm asking
if this will be a sort of sprint weekend and larger changes/cleanup in the aftermath? This
depends on context of course, but in light of recent discussions on patch pushing, QA, and
teams (that I need to catch up on) I wanted to see what we were doing here.

>
> See you this week-end.
>
> [1] <https://gitlab.com/pjotrp/guix-days-fosdem-2023/-/blob/main/releases-branches.txt>
>
> Best,

Thanks again, see you all on IRC and git logs this weekend!

John



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-15  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-11 22:16 A Joyous Core-Updates Week-End 🎉 Josselin Poiret
2023-04-12  9:55 ` Simon Tournier
2023-04-12 12:46 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-04-12 17:32 ` Status of Julia on core-updates (was Re: A Joyous Core-Updates Week-End 🎉) Simon Tournier
2023-04-12 17:56   ` Simon Tournier
2023-04-15  0:59 ` John Kehayias [this message]
2023-04-15  7:59   ` A Joyous Core-Updates Week-End 🎉 Josselin Poiret
2023-04-15  9:30     ` Andreas Enge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fs9255b6.fsf@protonmail.com \
    --to=john.kehayias@protonmail.com \
    --cc=dev@jpoiret.xyz \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.