[bug#29296] [PATCH 2/2] gexp: Add 'let-system'.

[Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --]

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> writes:

> Hi Ludo,
>
> maybe a little off-topic, but why do I have to use the following patch on
> armhf-linux (*not* cross compiling) in order to stop it from pulling in
> i686-cross-gcc?

Can you give a little more context?  Did this occur after the let-system
patch, or is this when using let-system?

Can you paste the derivation for mes@0.19 in the context this occurs?

Also, please file a new bug report.

> Makes no sense to me at all...

If only all bugs were obvious, our jobs would be so much easier!

> diff --git a/gnu/packages/mes.scm b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
> index 347aef0..524b8e8 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/mes.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
> @@ -120,8 +120,9 @@ extensive examples, including parsers for the Javascript and C99 languages.")
>              ((string-prefix? "x86_64-linux" target-system)
>               ;; Use cross-compiler rather than #:system "i686-linux" to get
>               ;; MesCC 64 bit .go files installed ready for use with Guile.
> -             `(("i686-linux-binutils" ,(cross-binutils "i686-unknown-linux-gnu"))
> -               ("i686-linux-gcc" ,(cross-gcc "i686-unknown-linux-gnu"))))
> +             `( ;("i686-linux-binutils" ,(cross-binutils "i686-unknown-linux-gnu"))
> +                ;("i686-linux-gcc" ,(cross-gcc "i686-unknown-linux-gnu"))
> +))
>              (else
>               '())))
>         ("graphviz" ,graphviz)

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]