Re: WARNING: Git merges are tricky. Rebasing is better?

[Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>]

Hello Kyle and Leo,

Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:

> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 05:26:08PM -0500, Kyle Meyer wrote:
>>> Fwiw I don't think Git automatically resolved that conflict:
>>> 
>>>   $ git checkout 276f40fdc349d2ad62582b23ea55e061b689cfc0^
>>>   $ git merge 276f40fdc349d2ad62582b23ea55e061b689cfc0^2
>> [...]   
>>>   ++<<<<<<< HEAD
>>>    +                "0r7m34xzz3shdfxf2abxb069izak3yv3ijlg29qy4pfmyawkilfs"))
>>>    +              (patches
>>>    +               (search-patches "epiphany-update-libportal-usage.patch"))))
>>>   ++||||||| d91de53caa
>>>   ++                "0r7m34xzz3shdfxf2abxb069izak3yv3ijlg29qy4pfmyawkilfs"))))
>>>   ++
>>>   ++=======
>>>   +                 "0k7b22zq3z1kllzqxgwsvwb1lp0j6rjb3k1hvhna3i573wc4mpji"))))
>>>   + 
>>>   ++>>>>>>> 276f40fdc349d2ad62582b23ea55e061b689cfc0^2
>>
>> So, you think it was a mistake made when resolving conflicts by hand? I
>> can certainly understand that.
>
> Yes.
>
>> Either way, it's bad that the Git history doesn't show these types of
>> changes.
>
> Right, inspecting merge results can be confusing.  By default that
> change is pruned from diffs as "uninteresting" because the merge result
> matched the content in one of the parents (discussed in the "COMBINED
> DIFF FORMAT" section of git-diff's manpage and the --diff-merges
> description of git-show's manpage).
>
>   $ git show 276f40fd | grep 0r7m34xzz
>   $ git show --diff-merges=combined 276f40fd | grep 0r7m34xzz
>    +                "0r7m34xzz3shdfxf2abxb069izak3yv3ijlg29qy4pfmyawkilfs"))

Thanks for this interesting discussion, and apologies for mis-resolving
the conflict :-)

Maxim