all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>, 40190@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: [bug#40190] Linux-Libre 5.6
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:28:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dywno8o.fsf@ponder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tv24mnbo.fsf@ponder>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2109 bytes --]

On 2020-03-31, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2020-03-31, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:
>>
>>> On 2020-03-30, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> And the second patch, switching to 5.5...
>>>
>>> And a third, rougher, less well tested patch switching to 5.6... which
>>> could obviously be squashed into the previous patches and maybe skip 5.5
>>> altogether.
>>
>> 5.5 is not an LTS kernel, so going straight to 5.6 sounds like the
>> right thing to do.  However...
>>
>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm.conf b/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm.conf
>>> similarity index 100%
>>> rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm.conf
>>> rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm.conf
...
>>
>> This does not seem right.  Surely there are _some_ configuration changes
>> in 5.6?
>
> Hence the "rough" patch.
>
> I honestly don't feel solid on all the configuration changes that need
> to happen, so haven't been particularly thorough on auditing those.
>
> Running through "make oldconfig" prompted me with many options about
> things I didn't really have a good grasp of, so the 5.5 changes at
> essentially just the 5.4*.conf copied to 5.5*.conf, and applying the
> copying the resulting .config from building the kernel into git...
>
> I could do the same for 5.6 again blindly taking the new defaults... or
> if someone could help with auditing the config updates, that would be
> great!

I pushed linux-libre 5.6 to master *without* setting it as the default
linux-libre version; only added linux-libre-arm64-generic-5.6 and
linux-libre-arm-generic-5.6 based on it.

Attached are the remaining patches to switch it to the default.

I still haven't thoroughly audited the config changes; this simply
copies 5.4-*.conf to 5.6-*.conf in the first patch, and in the second
patch updates them to 5.6 produced by building the package.

By splitting it into two patches, this allows diffing from the old 5.4
configs, but should maybe be squashed if this gets pushed to master.


Thanks for your review!


live well,
  vagrant

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-03 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19 19:14 RFC: Linux-Libre 5.5.x on pinebook pro Vagrant Cascadian
2020-03-19 19:25 ` Vincent Legoll
2020-03-20  4:35   ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-03-22 13:21 ` RFC: Linux-Libre 5.5.x Vagrant Cascadian
2020-03-23  4:08   ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-03-23  4:08     ` [bug#40190] " Vagrant Cascadian
2020-03-30 17:32     ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-03-30 17:34       ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-03-31  0:10         ` [bug#40190] Linux-Libre 5.6 Vagrant Cascadian
2020-03-31 14:30           ` Marius Bakke
2020-03-31 17:44             ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-03-31 18:35               ` Guillaume Le Vaillant
2020-04-03 23:28               ` Vagrant Cascadian [this message]
2020-04-03 23:29                 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-04-16 19:37                   ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-04-17 19:26                     ` Mark H Weaver
2020-06-08 20:46                       ` [bug#40190] Linux-Libre 5.7 Vagrant Cascadian
2020-06-08 20:52                         ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-06-09  2:43                       ` [bug#40190] Linux-Libre 5.6 Leo Famulari
2020-04-06  4:12     ` [bug#40190] Works for me Brendan Tildesley
2020-04-06 10:38       ` [bug#40190] v4l2loopback module builds with 5.4 but not 5.6 Brendan Tildesley
2020-04-06 10:46         ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-04-06 11:01         ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via
2020-08-05 21:29     ` bug#40190: Linux-Libre 5.5.x Leo Famulari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877dywno8o.fsf@ponder \
    --to=vagrant@debian.org \
    --cc=40190@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=mbakke@fastmail.com \
    --cc=mhw@netris.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.