all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
To: ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: whois: Move mkpasswd to its own output.
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:02:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8760l9akxv.fsf@elephly.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r33yvwrp.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>


ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> writes:

>> I might be overlooking something, but my gut reaction is that (1) it’s
>> not “bundling” in that we don’t have any other package providing
>> mkpasswd, and (2) it’s up to upstream to decide whether or not to
>> distribute mkpasswd.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Ludo’.
>>
> And upstreams decision is not to do it (on making it a choice not
> to build it or to move it to another tarball):
>
> "No, but thank you for asking."
>
> I think it's informative and neutral enough that I can just share
> this.
>
> So we stick with the default case? I'm still in favor for making
> it separate guix packages.

I’d rather stick with what upstream provides.  I don’t see an advantage
of separating these tools.

--
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-20 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-04 18:07 "unbundle" mkpasswd from whois ng0
2017-01-04 18:07 ` [PATCH] gnu: whois: Move mkpasswd to its own output ng0
2017-01-09  9:34   ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-01-09 10:28     ` ng0
2017-01-09 14:29       ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-01-09 14:37         ` ng0
2017-01-09 14:45           ` Whois: Update to 5.2.14 ng0
2017-01-09 14:45             ` [PATCH] gnu: whois: " ng0
2017-01-09 21:05               ` Leo Famulari
2017-01-20 10:41         ` [PATCH] gnu: whois: Move mkpasswd to its own output ng0
2017-01-20 11:32           ` Hartmut Goebel
2017-01-20 13:52           ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-01-21  0:45             ` ng0
2017-01-20 14:02           ` Ricardo Wurmus [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8760l9akxv.fsf@elephly.net \
    --to=rekado@elephly.net \
    --cc=contact.ng0@cryptolab.net \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.