[bug#39804] [PATCH] gnu: add emacs-exwm-next package (i.e. exwm for emacs-next)

[Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>]

Hi Leo!

Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:

> Am Dienstag, den 10.03.2020, 23:54 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> Hello Leo,
>> 
>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
>> > 
>> > > Am Freitag, den 28.02.2020, 09:32 +0100 schrieb Pierre Neidhardt:
>> > > > The `#:emacs` field tells the build system which Emacs package
>> > > > to use
>> > > > to
>> > > > build this package.  There may be something that not compatible
>> > > > between
>> > > > our current build system and emacs-next.
>> > > > 
>> > > > I've CC'ed Maxim and Leo, they might know more than me.
>> > > This issue should be addressed by #39375, which is currently
>> > > waiting to
>> > > be pushed to master or staging.
>> > 
>> > If we don't hear back from
>> > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39823 in a day or
>> > two, I'd
>> > be OK with pushing #39375 to master.
>> 
>> There have been no activity or reply on #39823 yet, so feel free to
>> push
>> the workaround discussed earlier (on the master branch is fine).
>> 
>> Maxim
> Following the discussion in 39823, we now have two options.
> 1. loading the library in advance as I do.
> 2. wrapping our code in `(eval ...)'.
> The latter has the advantage of not needing an additional function, but
> both require a build system change.
>
> WDYT?

#1 would be best, as it is a general fix, and we can even add a
 parameter to allow choosing between dynamic vs lexcal evaluation (see
 the doc for `eval', it takes such a parameter and defaults to
 dynamical).

Maxim