From: Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>, "Ekaitz Zarraga" <ekaitz@elenq.tech>
Cc: Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name>, Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils)
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:13:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734rpkcww.fsf@xelera.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmp5l3r3.fsf@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1998 bytes --]
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@elenq.tech> skribis:
>
>> On 2024-04-04 21:48, Attila Lendvai wrote:
>>> all in all, just by following my gut insctincts, i was advodating
>>> for building everything from git even before the exposure of this
>>> backdoor. in fact, i found it surprising as a guix newbie that not
>>> everything is built from git (or their VCS of choice).
>>
>> That has happened to me too.
>> Why not use Git directly always?
>
> Because it create{s,d} a bootstrapping issue. The
> “builtin:git-download” method was added only recently to guix-daemon and
> cannot be assumed to be available yet:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65866
This fortunately will help a lot with the "everything built from git"
part of the "whishlist", but what about the not zero occurrences of
"other upstream VCSs"?
[...]
> I think we should gradually move to building everything from
> source—i.e., fetching code from VCS and adding Autoconf & co. as inputs.
>
> This has been suggested several times before. The difficulty, as you
> point out, will lie in addressing bootstrapping issues with core
> packages: glibc, GCC, Binutils, Coreutils, etc. I’m not sure how to do
> that but…
does it have to be an "all of nothing" choiche? I mean "continue using
release tarballs" vs "use git" for "all"?
If using git is unfeaseable for bootstrapping reasons [1], why not
cointinue using release tarballs with some _extra_ verifications steps
and possibly add some automation steps to "lint" to help contributors
and committers check that there are not "quasi-binary" seeds [2] hidden
in release tarballs?
WDYT?
[...]
Grazie! Gio'
[1] or other reasons specific to a package that should be documented
when needed, at least with a comment in the package definition
[2] the autogenerated files that are not pragmatically verifiable
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 849 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-13 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-29 20:57 Backdoor in upstream xz-utils John Kehayias
2024-03-29 17:51 ` Ryan Prior
2024-03-29 20:39 ` Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2024-03-29 20:55 ` Tomas Volf
2024-03-30 21:02 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-04-04 10:34 ` backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils) Giovanni Biscuolo
2024-04-04 15:12 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-04-04 16:47 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2024-04-04 15:47 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2024-04-04 19:48 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-04-04 20:32 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2024-04-10 13:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-04-11 12:43 ` Andreas Enge
2024-04-11 12:56 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2024-04-11 13:49 ` Andreas Enge
2024-04-11 14:05 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2024-04-13 0:14 ` Skyler Ferris
2024-04-19 14:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-04-13 6:50 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2024-04-13 10:26 ` Skyler Ferris
2024-04-13 12:47 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2024-04-14 16:22 ` Skyler Ferris
2024-04-12 13:09 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-04-12 20:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-04-13 6:13 ` Giovanni Biscuolo [this message]
2024-05-07 18:22 ` 3 kinds of bootstrap (was Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts) Simon Tournier
2024-04-05 10:13 ` backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils) Giovanni Biscuolo
2024-04-05 14:51 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-04-13 7:42 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2024-04-04 23:03 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-04-05 7:06 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2024-04-05 7:39 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-04-05 16:52 ` Jan Wielkiewicz
2024-03-31 15:04 ` Backdoor in upstream xz-utils Rostislav Svoboda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8734rpkcww.fsf@xelera.eu \
--to=g@xelera.eu \
--cc=attila@lendvai.name \
--cc=ekaitz@elenq.tech \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.