all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>,
	Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>,
	Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why is glib still grafted on the 'wip-ungrafting' branch? (was Re: wip-ungrafting builds stuck)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:27:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rb21dy4.fsf@netris.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YICmiNpkyOTrFRlq@jasmine.lan>

Hi Leo,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:47:06PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> I just noticed that 'glib' is still grafted on the 'wip-ungrafting'
>> branch.  Was that intentional?
>> 
>> https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/glib.scm?h=wip-ungrafting&id=e12210dc92098d8581cea3007d57dbb6be16bb41#n171
>
> Yes. For that branch I only selected grafts that I judged to be
> "simple". There are many other grafts still in place on that branch.

Okay, thanks for the explanation.

> My criteria for simplicity are grafts that either apply one or two
> patches, or are minor version upgrades of projects that are known to
> care about ABI compatibility.

I don't understand why it's relevant how many patches are involved.  It
sounds like if I had concatenated all of the CVE-2021-27219 patches into
a single file, you would have judged that as "simple", and therefore
ungrafted it, although it makes no substantive difference.

Anyway, it makes no difference to me; I'll continue doing my own thing
on my private branch.  I just wanted to make sure that it wasn't an
oversight.

     Thanks,
       Mark


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-22 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-18 10:02 wip-ungrafting builds stuck Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-18 10:13 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2021-04-18 10:14 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2021-04-18 16:07   ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-21  2:47     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-04-21 20:47 ` Why is glib still grafted on the 'wip-ungrafting' branch? (was Re: wip-ungrafting builds stuck) Mark H Weaver
2021-04-21 22:26   ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-22 16:27     ` Mark H Weaver [this message]
2021-04-22 18:10       ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-30 16:32 ` wip-ungrafting builds stuck Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-30 17:18   ` Leo Famulari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871rb21dy4.fsf@netris.org \
    --to=mhw@netris.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=leo@famulari.name \
    --cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=othacehe@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.