bug#62656: broken guix time-machine + software-heritage

[Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Cool you did this test! :-)

On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 at 23:39, Nicolas Graves via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> wrote:

> Here is the content + backtrace of the time-machine call, after the ~10
> hours long object processing on Software Heritage side:

Last time I checked that, I never got the object from SWH because a bug
on their side.  Nice now they cook the content.

Note that SWH is an archive and so it is expected to take a long time to
extract a large dataset as the files of the Guix repository is.  Many
data are stored cold not to say frozen and that’s why it takes a long
time to warm them up.


>> guix time-machine -C channels.scm -- shell
> Mise à jour du canal « guix » depuis le dépôt Git « /https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git »...
> SWH: found revision 1984d56b0e437af7be7fa6cf8e1a00e45eb8ffa1 with directory at 'https://archive.softwareheritage.org/api/1/directory/1ea499e7529e67a0632ecbe0a8214f0618a82c1a/'
> swh:1:rev:1984d56b0e437af7be7fa6cf8e1a00e45eb8ffa1.git/
> swh:1:rev:1984d56b0e437af7be7fa6cf8e1a00e45eb8ffa1.git/HEAD

[...]

> swh:1:rev:1984d56b0e437af7be7fa6cf8e1a00e45eb8ffa1.git/objects/pack/pack-20648aeebad9dc6d8a29c87bd99d8fd773e1266a.pack
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1752:10 19 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
> In guix/store.scm:
>    659:37 18 (thunk)

[...]

> In unknown file:
>            3 (get-bytevector-n! #<input: string 7f8d1aad5cb0> # 0 #)
> In web/response.scm:
>      95:2  2 (read! _ _ _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1685:16  1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>   1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> Throw to key `bad-response' with args `("EOF while reading response body: ~a bytes of ~a" (53394376 296632320))'.

Well, if I understand correctly, SWH cooked the full Git repository of
Guix and somehow it is probably too big.  Hum, I do not know how to
investigate…

Thanks for the report!

Cheers,
simon