Re: Can zig-build-system be an alternative to the gnu-build-system?

[Blake Shaw <blake@reproduciblemedia.com>]

This has reminded me of Make's built-in support for guile[1].

I've assumed that the fact that we don't use it means that it
probably depends on an earlier guile, as many projects many
that support "guile scripting" typically depend on ~v1.8; but
that is just an assumption.

Does anyone know what its status is?

[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Guile-Integration.html

Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@thebird.nl> writes:

> Hi jgart,
>
> zig as a build system is nice, but it is llvm bound and only targets
> zig and C/C++. It does not handle packages, and that is a feature in
> my book ;). Mind they are planning to go down the packaging route,
> from what I can tell.
>
> There have been some older discussions about creating our own
> replacement for autotools, cmake and others. I often fight these make
> make systems - and meson and/or language specific build systems. It is
> a time waster for programmers and none of these systems leverages the
> power of Guix itself. I kinda settled for cmake because, even though
> it is an effing dragon, at least I can make it work (pun intended).
>
> We need someone with deep experience in build systems to write a guile
> replacement - generating ninja is one idea. That is my opinion :). I
> would love a simple way to describe a project in guile. It should not
> be too hard actually (famously that is how these projects start and
> turn out to be a real time sink). Maybe someone wants to try with
> guidance from us, or maybe we can do it when we get bored some day.
>
> Pj.
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:03:06AM +0000, jgart wrote:
>> Can `zig-build-system` be an alternative to the `gnu-build-system`? 
>> 
>> https://ziglang.org/learn/why\_zig\_rust\_d\_cpp/#a-package-manager-and-build-system-for-existing-projects
>> 
>> > Not only can you write Zig code instead of C or C++ code, but you
>> can use Zig as a replacement for autotools, cmake, make, scons,
>> ninja, etc. And on top of this, it (will) provide a package manager
>> for native dependencies. This build system is intended to be
>> appropriate even if the entirety of a project’s codebase is in C or
>> C++.
>> 
>> WDYT
>>