Re: The case for moving raw binaries

[Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 815 bytes --]

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op do 28-04-2022 om 18:37 [+0200]:
> the shell by typing a dot and using tab completion.  What's more, in
> some build systems there might be two (or even more) off them.  This
> makes a generic wrap after wrap pattern almost impossible to achieve.
> 
> So, what's the fix?  I propose moving rawbins to a different location.
> libexec would spring to mind as a place in which we could hide them, so

How does this help with double wrapping?  Whether the wrappers /
originals are put in /bin or $RAWBIN_DIR, it's still wrapped twice.

Also, FWIW, double-wrapping works nicely for 'wrap-program' -- it just
appende or prepended some extra X=Y lines.  With some work and test
cases, 'wrap-script' could be extended to support such a thing as well.

Greetings,
Maxime.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]