From: "Jonathan McHugh" <indieterminacy@libre.brussels>
To: "zimoun" <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>,
"Arun Isaac" <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>,
"Ricardo Wurmus" <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Incentives for review
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:40:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56916bb7cac2f062f19a160f6258720c@libre.brussels> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86zgr1xvwz.fsf@gmail.com>
Hi Simon,
October 22, 2021 11:22 AM, "zimoun" <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 08:37, "Jonathan McHugh" <indieterminacy@libre.brussels> wrote:
>
>> Its also worth citing some of the suggestions in this devel-guix thread concerning tooling or
>> options:
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-08/msg00042.html
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Suggestions included:
>> Bugs Everywhere https://bugs-everywhere.readthedocs.io/en/latest
>> Git-Issue https://github.com/dspinellis/git-issue
>> Fossil https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/bugtheory.wiki
>>
>> IMHO, I though Bugs Everywhere was the most interesting, though it may have experienced some
>> bitrot.
>
> Git based, it is possible to use public-inbox with:
>
> <https://yhetil.org/guix-bugs>
>
Yes, Arun has recommended public-inbox before, Im enthused by anything he uses or packages.
>> More recently I have been deliberating on the idea of using a MUD type
>> tool as an interface for issue and bugtracking.
>
> Yeah, maybe gamify the review could help. Maybe Libreadventure could
> help.
>
> 1: <https://vcs.fsf.org/?p=libreadventure.git;a=tree>
> 2: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-09/msg00208.html>
>
Thanks for the catch, I had forgotten that one (and your appeal for someebody to package it!).
The fact its been trialed with FSF and could be Guix Days compatible is a big plus.
TBH, having mastered lua/jit I would feel a bit dirty packaging NPN to satisfy something that Lua would be better suited for. What are the (technical/usability) advantages of choosing LibreAdventure?
I will reflect on this, though Im (personally) more interested in building worlds from GemText than JSON.
# One more suggestion
Has anybody ever considered or used psyc - Protocol for Synchronous Conferencing?
(its how I discovered Powwow)
https://psyc.eu/
``` description
Imagine smartly multicasted chat and conferencing, non-proprietary instant messaging, distributed social networking and data sharing. And now imagine all of this rolled into one. PSYC is an open source protocol and technology, bringing the useful and amazing aspects of several technologies, some of which have been proprietary too long, together.
````
It has a curious mixture of bit ambition and long history but I cant (yet) tell how modern and functional it is.
Pscyc utilities seem interesting
https://perl.psyc.eu/
```
git2psyc - report changes to a git repository into a developer chatroom
psycauth - authenticate something with your PSYC identity
psyccat - dump a file to a PSYC recipient
psyccmd - remote control psycamp and whatever wants to be controlled
psycfilemonitor*- notify changes to the file system in realtime
psycion - amazing console psyc client!
psyclisten - receive messages and notify the user about them
psycmail - report incoming emails to the recipient
psycamp* - media player with PSYC notification and remote control
psycmsg - send a message to a PSYC recipient
psycnotify - send presence notification from the command line
psycsyncd - interfaces PSYC SYNC protocol to DBI (SQL databases etc)
syslog2psyc - daemon that receives events from syslog and forwards to PSYC
remotor - control console for Tor routers that can notify into PSYC
```
For my purposes, the PSYC Syntax Specification could potentially serve orthogonal aspects for complementing the design principles of the Gemini protocol
https://about.psyc.eu/Spec:Syntax
https://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/specification.html
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-22 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-15 18:54 Tricking peer review Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-15 22:03 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2021-10-15 22:28 ` Ryan Prior
2021-10-15 22:45 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2021-10-15 22:59 ` Ryan Prior
2021-10-18 7:40 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-18 19:56 ` Ryan Prior
2021-10-19 8:39 ` zimoun
2021-10-20 23:03 ` Leo Famulari
2021-10-21 8:14 ` zimoun
2021-10-15 23:13 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-10-18 7:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-18 7:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-19 8:36 ` zimoun
2021-10-19 12:56 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-19 14:22 ` zimoun
2021-10-19 15:41 ` Incentives for review Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-19 16:56 ` zimoun
2021-10-19 19:14 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-10-19 19:34 ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
2021-10-19 19:50 ` Joshua Branson
2021-10-21 20:03 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-20 21:37 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-10-21 13:38 ` Artem Chernyak
2021-10-22 20:03 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-10-23 1:43 ` Kyle Meyer
2021-10-23 3:42 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-10-23 7:37 ` zimoun
2021-10-23 16:18 ` public-inbox/elfeed -> Maildir bridge (was: Incentives for review) Kyle Meyer
2021-10-24 12:18 ` Jonathan McHugh
2021-10-21 16:06 ` Incentives for review Ricardo Wurmus
2021-10-21 16:32 ` zimoun
2021-10-22 20:06 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-10-21 15:07 ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2021-10-21 16:10 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-10-21 17:52 ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2021-10-21 18:21 ` Arun Isaac
2021-10-21 19:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-21 21:42 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-10-22 10:48 ` Arun Isaac
2021-10-22 11:21 ` zimoun
2021-10-23 6:09 ` Arun Isaac
2021-10-22 10:56 ` Jonathan McHugh
2021-10-22 7:40 ` zimoun
2021-10-22 11:09 ` Arun Isaac
2021-10-22 8:37 ` Jonathan McHugh
2021-10-22 9:15 ` zimoun
2021-10-22 10:40 ` Jonathan McHugh [this message]
2021-10-22 11:32 ` zimoun
2021-10-21 21:18 ` Jonathan McHugh
2021-10-22 10:44 ` Arun Isaac
2021-10-22 11:06 ` Jonathan McHugh
2021-10-21 21:22 ` zimoun
2021-10-28 14:57 ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2021-10-21 17:51 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2021-10-24 11:47 ` Efraim Flashner
2021-10-20 8:22 ` Tricking peer review Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-10-20 9:10 ` zimoun
2021-10-20 8:29 ` patches for new packages proper workflow (Re: Tricking peer review) Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-10-20 23:09 ` Tricking peer review Leo Famulari
2021-10-21 7:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-25 13:09 ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
2021-10-28 8:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56916bb7cac2f062f19a160f6258720c@libre.brussels \
--to=indieterminacy@libre.brussels \
--cc=arunisaac@systemreboot.net \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
--cc=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.