From: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Naming of node packages with @ and /
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:46:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a63c5bc9111b26d48df1d40e62bac79@lepiller.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fafd0b30-5c39-57aa-9c63-8febe2e0898e@riseup.net>
Le 2018-11-28 12:21, swedebugia a écrit :
> On 2018-11-28 00:10, Catonano wrote:
>>
>>
>> Il giorno mar 27 nov 2018 alle ore 21:58 swedebugia
>> <swedebugia@riseup.net <mailto:swedebugia@riseup.net>> ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> There are some crazy naming going on in the node-community. How do
>> we
>> deal with this?
>>
>> Note: there is another package called "babel-core" so just
>> stripping/replacing the weird characters won't work well.
>>
>> Any ideas?
> snip
>
>> I think those are the so called "scoped packages"
>>
>> https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/scope
>>
>> https://nitayneeman.com/posts/understanding-scoped-packages-in-npm/
>
> Aha! This makes sense. The importer and guix package will have to
> handle this.
>
> E.g. this way:
>
> guix import npm -S babel babe-core
> where -S is "scope".
>
> We will probably have to add a field or property to our (package)
> record stating that it is part of a scope:
> (properties
> `((scope . babel)))
>
> guix package will have to support it too:
> guix package -i -S babel babel-core
>
> What do you think? Any better ways to handle this?
Do we have to bother with scope? Can't we simply import the package like
so:
guix import npm @babel/babel-core
and install the corresponding package with
guix package -i bable/bable-core
I don't like the idea of adding this notion of scope to guix, unless we
really need it for something?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-28 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-27 21:02 Naming of node packages with @ and / swedebugia
2018-11-27 23:10 ` Catonano
2018-11-28 11:21 ` swedebugia
2018-11-28 12:46 ` Julien Lepiller [this message]
2018-11-28 20:34 ` swedebugia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a63c5bc9111b26d48df1d40e62bac79@lepiller.eu \
--to=julien@lepiller.eu \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.