Re: Bleeding edge documentation

[Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is>]

Joshua Branson transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> 
> > Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is> writes:
> >
> >> swedebugia transcribed 1.0K bytes:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> I would like to have a continously updated documentation for guix on the webpage in addition to the release documentation.
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to read up on guix and the guix.texi file is hard to handle on a mobile device and it is quite cumbersome.
> >>>
> >>> The 0.14 docs are now heavily outdated in my opinion.
> >>> --
> >>> Cheers Swedebugia
> >>
> >> This is due to gnu.org using CVS and with every release we have
> >> to upload the documentation by hand.
> >> Instead of moving the entire webpage out of gnu.org (which has
> >> been proposed before), why not create docs.guixsd.org and
> >> use that for updated documentation material?
> >
> > We have applied for a gnu.org subdomain a couple of weeks ago, but
> > progress is slow.  The goal is to move to infrastructure that we can
> > more easily (and automatically) update.
> 
> May I ask what are some of the other infrastructure options are?
> notabug? I'm sure you'll guys will choose a good one, but I'm just curious.

This is about choosing a static webview for the documentation,
not a convenience solution which renders them -- which notabug
doesn't do by the way.
The documentation you view on gnu.org is just checked in into CVS.