[bug#60320] [PATCH] doc: Improve user-group documentation.

[bug#60320] [PATCH] doc: Improve user-group documentation.

[Simon Josefsson via Guix-patches via]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 566 bytes --]

Hi.

Not knowing better I added this to my operating-system form:

  (groups (cons* (user-group
                  (name "jas")
                  (id "1000"))
                %base-groups))

Running 'guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm' worked fine, and upon
boot I was placed in group 30001.  Any idea what happened?  A warning
would have been nice.

If there had been an example in the manual I wouldn't have made the
mistake, so the attached patch improves this manual page:
https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/en/html_node/User-Accounts.html#User-Accounts

/Simon

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-doc-Improve-user-group-documentation.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1760 bytes --]

From 6b7464c2820fd5f8b570f78e6e79752bc47ceaf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 22:04:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Improve user-group documentation.

* doc/guix.texi (User Accounts): Add user-group form and modify user-group
text and examples to use it.
---
 doc/guix.texi | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index c5ae350a47..79475915ec 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -17165,8 +17165,8 @@ select the file system in an elegant fashion!
 @cindex accounts
 @cindex user accounts
 User accounts and groups are entirely managed through the
-@code{operating-system} declaration.  They are specified with the
-@code{user-account} and @code{user-group} forms:
+@code{operating-system} declaration.  Users are specified with the
+@code{user-account} form:
 
 @lisp
 (user-account
@@ -17179,13 +17179,23 @@ User accounts and groups are entirely managed through the
   (comment "Bob's sister"))
 @end lisp
 
-Here's a user account that uses a different shell and a custom home
-directory (the default would be @file{"/home/bob"}):
+Groups are specified with the @code{user-group} form:
+
+@lisp
+(user-group
+  (name "bob")
+  (id 1000))
+  %base-groups))
+@end lisp
+
+Here's a user account that uses a different shell, a custom home
+directory (the default would be @file{"/home/bob"}) and uses the
+@code{bob} group instead of the traditional @code{users}.
 
 @lisp
 (user-account
   (name "bob")
-  (group "users")
+  (group "bob")
   (comment "Alice's bro")
   (shell (file-append zsh "/bin/zsh"))
   (home-directory "/home/robert"))
-- 
2.38.1


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 255 bytes --]

[bug#60320] [PATCH] doc: Improve user-group documentation.

[Julien Lepiller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1002 bytes --]

I think the group was created, but you probably forgot to add yourself to that new group. At least, what you show us looks correct, for adding a group to you os declaration.

Note your user-group example is unbalanced. The manual is a bit long to read, but it seems correct to me.

Le 25 décembre 2022 22:19:00 GMT+01:00, Simon Josefsson via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> a écrit :
>Hi.
>
>Not knowing better I added this to my operating-system form:
>
>  (groups (cons* (user-group
>                  (name "jas")
>                  (id "1000"))
>                %base-groups))
>
>Running 'guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm' worked fine, and upon
>boot I was placed in group 30001.  Any idea what happened?  A warning
>would have been nice.
>
>If there had been an example in the manual I wouldn't have made the
>mistake, so the attached patch improves this manual page:
>https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/en/html_node/User-Accounts.html#User-Accounts
>
>/Simon

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1374 bytes --]