[bug#54309] What is the process from here?

[fesoj000 <fesoj000@gmail.com>]

On 3/20/22 12:09 AM, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op vr 18-03-2022 om 23:36 [+0100]:
>>> +(define (auditd-activation config)
>>> +  (with-imported-modules '((guix build utils))
>>> +    #~(begin
>>> +        (use-modules (guix build utils))
>>> +        (let ((var-log-audit "/var/log/audit"))
>>> +          (umask #o077)
>>> +          (mkdir-p var-log-audit)))))
>>> +
>> This would also apply umask 077 to /var and /var/log if those don't
>> already exist.  More importantly, code executed after that will also
>> inherit the umask, which I don't think is the intended consequence.
> 
> More concretely, the procedure 'mkdir-p/perms' would address the umask
> issue, but not the potential ‘oops too restrictive permissions for /var
> and /var/log' issue.
Ok, i can assume that a future version of 'mkdir-p/perms' will handle the
umask.

Should the activation now handle potential permission problems from past
activations and auditd starts? Can you try to explain in more detail
please?

BR