[bug#35516] [PATCH 0/1] gnu: emacs: Add lcms as an input.

[bug#35516] [PATCH 0/1] gnu: emacs: Add lcms as an input.

[wednesday]

There is not much of a need or reason for this, other than futher completing
the TODO, which after this and my other patches I think may be complete. What
adding this does is add a few elisp functions for converting to some formats,
and working with lcms.

wednesday (1):
  gnu: emacs: Add lcms to inputs.

 gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

-- 
2.21.0

[bug#35516] [PATCH 0/1] gnu: emacs: Add lcms as an input.

[Brett Gilio]

wednesday <jessejohngildersleve@zohomail.eu> writes:

> There is not much of a need or reason for this, other than futher completing
> the TODO, which after this and my other patches I think may be complete. What
> adding this does is add a few elisp functions for converting to some formats,
> and working with lcms.
>
> wednesday (1):
>   gnu: emacs: Add lcms to inputs.
>
>  gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Hi, I know this patch is quite old but our Emacs currently still does
not have LCMS support. LCMS was introduced in the 26 release, and I am
curious if anybody had any thoughts on adding this? From what I gather
27 is due to be marked as stable any week now.

[bug#35516] [PATCH 0/1] gnu: emacs: Add lcms as an input.

[Marius Bakke]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 866 bytes --]

Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org> writes:

> wednesday <jessejohngildersleve@zohomail.eu> writes:
>
>> There is not much of a need or reason for this, other than futher completing
>> the TODO, which after this and my other patches I think may be complete. What
>> adding this does is add a few elisp functions for converting to some formats,
>> and working with lcms.
>>
>> wednesday (1):
>>   gnu: emacs: Add lcms to inputs.
>>
>>  gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Hi, I know this patch is quite old but our Emacs currently still does
> not have LCMS support. LCMS was introduced in the 26 release, and I am
> curious if anybody had any thoughts on adding this? From what I gather
> 27 is due to be marked as stable any week now.

No objections from me.  Emacs already has 'lcms' in its closure so there
would be no size difference.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]

[bug#35516] [PATCH 0/1] gnu: emacs: Add lcms as an input.

[zimoun]

Hi,

Looking at old submission, it appears that

        <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35516>

had fallen into the cracks.


On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 at 18:21, Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org> wrote:
> Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org> writes:
>> wednesday <jessejohngildersleve@zohomail.eu> writes:
>>
>>> There is not much of a need or reason for this, other than futher completing
>>> the TODO, which after this and my other patches I think may be complete. What
>>> adding this does is add a few elisp functions for converting to some formats,
>>> and working with lcms.
>>>
>>> wednesday (1):
>>>   gnu: emacs: Add lcms to inputs.
>>>
>>>  gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> Hi, I know this patch is quite old but our Emacs currently still does
>> not have LCMS support. LCMS was introduced in the 26 release, and I am
>> curious if anybody had any thoughts on adding this? From what I gather
>> 27 is due to be marked as stable any week now.
>
> No objections from me.  Emacs already has 'lcms' in its closure so there
> would be no size difference.

 Marius, since you have commit access, could you push this change?  And
thus close this. :-)


Cheers,
simon

bug#35516: [PATCH 0/1] gnu: emacs: Add lcms as an input.

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi,

Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org> writes:

> Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> wednesday <jessejohngildersleve@zohomail.eu> writes:
>>
>>> There is not much of a need or reason for this, other than futher completing
>>> the TODO, which after this and my other patches I think may be complete. What
>>> adding this does is add a few elisp functions for converting to some formats,
>>> and working with lcms.
>>>
>>> wednesday (1):
>>>   gnu: emacs: Add lcms to inputs.
>>>
>>>  gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> Hi, I know this patch is quite old but our Emacs currently still does
>> not have LCMS support. LCMS was introduced in the 26 release, and I am
>> curious if anybody had any thoughts on adding this? From what I gather
>> 27 is due to be marked as stable any week now.
>
> No objections from me.  Emacs already has 'lcms' in its closure so there
> would be no size difference.

Applied to staging with fd5b7393a0.

Closing; thank you!

Maxim