[bug#30214] [PATCH 03/10] gnu: Add go-github.com-jessevdk-go-flags.

[Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1363 bytes --]


Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 07:51:06PM +0000, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:08:23PM +0000, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> >> * gnu/packages/golang.scm (go-github.com-jessevdk-go-flags): New variable.
>> >
>> >> +         (add-after 'unpack 'rename-archive
>> >> +           (lambda _
>> >> +             (rename-file
>> >> +              ,(string-append "src/github.com/jessevdk/go-flags-" version)
>> >> +              "src/github.com/jessevdk/go-flags")
>> >> +             #t)))))
>> >
>> > Should the go-build-system try to handle this automatically?
>> 
>> I believe this might be connected with what is in the source
>> tarball. Without this stage, the go-flags directory is called
>> go-flags-1.3.0, and this causes the build to fail [2].
>
> Oh right, Go expects you to use Git checkouts instead of release
> tarballs. I bet it works if you do that. That kind of tarball is
> automatically created by GitHub per tag, and can't be disabled.
>
>> I'm not sure about the wider context, but it would be good to handle
>> this automatically.
>
> So, I think the build system doesn't need to handle this case.

Ok, would it be more appropriate to use a git checkout, rather than a
tar archive for these packages then?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 962 bytes --]