[bug#44427] [PATCH] lint: Add 'check-haskell-stackage' checker.

["Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>]

Hi Timothy,

Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com> skribis:

> To make the test work, I made sure our Hackage and Stackage importers
> use base URLs that are parameters.  Then, I used ‘with-http-server’ and
> ‘parameterize’d the URLs to use the local server.  (This all follows the
> example of the SWH checker.)  It might be clearer if the test were split
> in two, but the Stackage importer memoizes the list of packages sent
> from the Stackage server.  That means that the two tests would have to
> be run in a certain order to work, which is pretty dodgy.
>
> Is the test too complicated to be worth it?  I might be able to make it
> a little clearer, but I’m not sure it’s worth including at all.
> Thoughts?

I think it’s fine.

>>From 7e01e8adddeaba7a2c0b3a79425da26f3c2584df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com>
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:30:28 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] lint: Add 'check-haskell-stackage' checker.
>
> * guix/lint.scm (check-haskell-stackage): New procedure.
> (%network-dependent-checkers): Add 'haskell-stackage' checker.
> * guix/import/hackage.scm (%hackage-url): New variable.
> (hackage-source-url, hackage-cabal-url): Use it in place of a
> hard-coded string.
> * guix/import/stackage.scm (%stackage-url): Make it a parameter.
> (stackage-lts-info-fetch): Update accordingly.
> * tests/lint.scm ("hackage-stackage"): New test.

LGTM, thank you!

‘%stackage-updater’ only offers versions that are in LTS Stackage,
right?

Ludo’.