[bug#67880] [PATCH] teams: Add ‘core-packages’ team.

[bug#67880] [PATCH] teams: Add ‘core-packages’ team.

[Ludovic Courtès]

* etc/teams.scm (bootstrap): Add “gnu/packages/commencement.scm”.
(core-packages): New team.
(Ludovic Courtès): Add to ‘core-packages’ team.

Change-Id: I25f22d436a4dc9bf4c8f577f94cc178cbaa80768
---
 etc/teams.scm | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Hello Guix!

This is something we discussed last week on IRC: adding a team for
“core” packages.  By that I mean: the GNU tool chain, Guile, all
the things in (gnu packages base), and probably the closure of all
this.

These are the packages we would update on ‘core-updates’, and ideally
we wouldn’t touch any other package on that branch.  (So Python would
be handled on the ‘python-team’ branch, for instance.)

How does that sound?

I know of a handful of people who’d deserve to be members.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.

diff --git a/etc/teams.scm b/etc/teams.scm
index 76633c2184..9cf827af29 100755
--- a/etc/teams.scm
+++ b/etc/teams.scm
@@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ (define-team go
 (define-team bootstrap
   (team 'bootstrap
         #:name "Bootstrap"
-        #:scope (list "gnu/packages/mes.scm")))
+        #:scope (list "gnu/packages/commencement.scm"
+                      "gnu/packages/mes.scm")))
 
 (define-team embedded
   (team 'embedded
@@ -424,6 +425,21 @@ (define-team core
               (make-regexp* "^guix/scripts/")
               (make-regexp* "^guix/store/"))))
 
+(define-team core-packages
+  (team 'core-packages
+        #:name "Core packages"
+        #:description "Core packages: the GNU tool chain, Guile, Coreutils, etc."
+        #:scope (list "gnu/packages/base.scm"
+                      "gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm"
+                      "gnu/packages/commencement.scm"
+                      "gnu/packages/cross-base.scm"
+                      "gnu/packages/gcc.scm"
+                      "gnu/packages/guile.scm"
+                      "gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm"
+                      "guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm"
+                      "guix/build/utils.scm"
+                      "guix/build-system/gnu.scm")))
+
 (define-team games
   (team 'games
         #:name "Games and Toys"
@@ -554,7 +570,7 @@ (define-member (person "Jonathan Brielmaier"
 
 (define-member (person "Ludovic Courtès"
                        "ludo@gnu.org")
-  core home bootstrap installer mentors)
+  core home bootstrap core-packages installer mentors)
 
 (define-member (person "Andreas Enge"
                        "andreas@enge.fr")

base-commit: b681e339fa37f2a26763458ee56b31af1d6a7ec5
-- 
2.41.0

[bug#67880] [PATCH] teams: Add ‘core-packages’ team.

[Mathieu Othacehe]

Hey Ludo,

> +(define-team core-packages
> +  (team 'core-packages
> +        #:name "Core packages"
> +        #:description "Core packages: the GNU tool chain, Guile, Coreutils, etc."
> +        #:scope (list "gnu/packages/base.scm"
> +                      "gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm"
> +                      "gnu/packages/commencement.scm"
> +                      "gnu/packages/cross-base.scm"
> +                      "gnu/packages/gcc.scm"
> +                      "gnu/packages/guile.scm"
> +                      "gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm"
> +                      "guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm"
> +                      "guix/build/utils.scm"
> +                      "guix/build-system/gnu.scm")))

Seems nice. This has probably already been discussed, but should
core-updates be renamed core-packages here to be more inline with the
teams workflow?

Thanks,

Mathieu

[bug#67880] [PATCH] teams: Add ‘core-packages’ team.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi!

Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> skribis:

>> +(define-team core-packages
>> +  (team 'core-packages
>> +        #:name "Core packages"
>> +        #:description "Core packages: the GNU tool chain, Guile, Coreutils, etc."
>> +        #:scope (list "gnu/packages/base.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/commencement.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/cross-base.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/gcc.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/guile.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm"
>> +                      "guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm"
>> +                      "guix/build/utils.scm"
>> +                      "guix/build-system/gnu.scm")))
>
> Seems nice.

Cool, I’m applying the patch.

> This has probably already been discussed, but should core-updates be
> renamed core-packages here to be more inline with the teams workflow?

IMO yes, that’s the logical next step.  (Maybe we can wait until the
next cycle though, dunno.)

Thanks,
Ludo’.