[bug#69750] [PATCH] doc: Correct the "guix package --install-from-expression" example.

[bug#69750] [PATCH] doc: Correct the "guix package --install-from-expression" example.

[Rostislav Svoboda]

* doc/guix.texi (Invoking @command{guix package}): Correct the module where
'guile-final' is defined. It is actually located in (gnu packages
commencement) rather than in the (gnu packages base).

Change-Id: I7747106916d53dcbe296b7302983c5013eb2926d
---
 doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 858d5751bf..4ab9a7663c 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -3445,7 +3445,7 @@ Invoking guix package
 @var{exp} must be a Scheme expression that evaluates to a
 @code{<package>} object.  This option is notably useful to disambiguate
 between same-named variants of a package, with expressions such as
-@code{(@@ (gnu packages base) guile-final)}.
+@code{(@@ (gnu packages commencement) guile-final)}.
 
 Note that this option installs the first output of the specified
 package, which may be insufficient when needing a specific output of a

base-commit: 447e9c96259e8fa15a828de9b2dd3400e2ffafe6
-- 
2.41.0

[bug#69750] [PATCH] doc: Correct the "guix package --install-from-expression" example.

[Christopher Baines]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 484 bytes --]


Rostislav Svoboda <rostislav.svoboda@gmail.com> writes:

> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking @command{guix package}): Correct the module where
> 'guile-final' is defined. It is actually located in (gnu packages
> commencement) rather than in the (gnu packages base).
>
> Change-Id: I7747106916d53dcbe296b7302983c5013eb2926d
> ---
>  doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Thanks! I've pushed this to master as
4fe9aae225fa4ee0416d7cfa984bda8fcded8436.

Chris

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 987 bytes --]