From: Andrew Tropin <andrew@trop.in>
To: Mekeor Melire <mekeor@posteo.de>
Cc: 63984@debbugs.gnu.org, liliana.prikler@gmail.com
Subject: [bug#63984] [PATCH emacs-team 0/2] Start preparing for Emacs 29
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:30:01 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qihnvzq.fsf@trop.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sfaxwv18.fsf@posteo.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1329 bytes --]
On 2023-06-11 21:09, Mekeor Melire wrote:
> Hello :)
>
> 2023-06-11 09:35 andrew@trop.in:
>
>> Sounds reasonable, but I think it would be ok, if after updating
>> emacs, emacs-next will be 29 for a couple of weeks with
>> deprecation warning on top of it. The meaning of -next suffix is
>> a convention, not a technical limitation, so it's fine to
>> violate it for deprecation period.
>
>> Overall, deprecation is not something crucial here and people
>> know that guix breaks backward compatibility from time to time,
>> so I think it's ok to go without it.
>
> I think we don't need to divert deprecation/alias from its
> intended use. I think NEWS serves its job well enough.
>
> When having emacs-next installed and keeping it upgraded, users
> should be able to expect that the upcoming release of Emacs is
> installed, without deprecation warnings. After all, the package is
> not called emacs29 but emacs-next.
>
> That being said, I believe it's a good idea to
> define-deprecated/public-alias emacs-next-pgtk and
> emacs-next-pgtk-xwidgets.
All emacs-next* variables dissapear after this patch is applied and
talking about deprecation warning: I don't see much difference between
emacs-next and emacs-next-pgtk-xwidgets in this context.
--
Best regards,
Andrew Tropin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 16:22 [bug#63984] [PATCH emacs-team 0/2] Start preparing for Emacs 29 Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-06-09 8:40 ` [bug#63984] [PATCH emacs-team 1/2] gnu: Make emacs-next-tree-sitter the new emacs Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-06-09 11:28 ` [bug#63984] [PATCH emacs-team 2/2] gnu: Construct Emacs packages from bottom up Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-06-10 6:46 ` [bug#63984] [PATCH emacs-team 0/2] Start preparing for Emacs 29 Andrew Tropin
2023-06-10 7:46 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-06-10 8:20 ` Andrew Tropin
2023-06-10 8:51 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-06-11 5:35 ` Andrew Tropin
2023-06-11 21:09 ` Mekeor Melire
2023-06-12 4:30 ` Andrew Tropin [this message]
2023-07-04 7:39 ` Mekeor Melire
2023-07-08 17:04 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-07-12 18:15 ` Mekeor Melire
2023-07-13 16:20 ` bug#63984: " Liliana Marie Prikler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871qihnvzq.fsf@trop.in \
--to=andrew@trop.in \
--cc=63984@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=liliana.prikler@gmail.com \
--cc=mekeor@posteo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).