[bug#63984] [PATCH emacs-team 0/2] Start preparing for Emacs 29

[Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>]

Am Samstag, dem 10.06.2023 um 10:46 +0400 schrieb Andrew Tropin:
> On 2023-06-09 18:22, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> 
> > Hi Guix,
> > 
> > it's already been four weeks since the newest Emacs pre-release. 
> > Time
> > sure flies.  With that in mind, I'd like to start work in the Emacs
> > team
> > focused on
> > 1. streamlining our Emacs packages
> > 2. improving emacs-build-system and adapting it to the new features
> > of
> >    Emacs 29 (including the almost forgotten [1])
> > 3. improving our Emacs package management (i.e. making it easier to
> >    declare variants of emacs-* packages built with different
> > Emacsen)
> > 
> > This series gets us started on (1), so we can do (2) and (3)
> > hopefully
> > soon.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57122
> > 
> > Liliana Marie Prikler (2):
> >   gnu: Make emacs-next-tree-sitter the new emacs.
> >   gnu: Construct Emacs packages from bottom up.
> > 
> >  gnu/local.mk                                  |   1 -
> >  gnu/packages/emacs.scm                        | 467 +++++++-------
> > ----
> >  .../patches/emacs-source-date-epoch.patch     |  20 -
> >  3 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 298 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/emacs-source-date-
> > epoch.patch
> > 
> > 
> > base-commit: 44bbfc24e4bcc48d0e3343cd3d83452721af8c36
> 
> Hi Liliana, 
> 
> the patch series looks good, thank you for working on this.  Do we
> want to add (define-deprecated/alias) to make the transition to new
> emacs package names smoother?
Since it'll be a "world"-rebuilding change, I think a news entry ought
to be preferred.

Cheers