From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>,
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-maintainers@gnu.org, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>,
"Christopher Baines" <mail@cbaines.net>,
61894@debbugs.gnu.org, 宋文武 <iyzsong@envs.net>,
"Andreas Enge" <andreas@enge.fr>,
guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: [bug#61894] [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:48:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86v8janwdm.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874jqvul1v.fsf@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 13:58, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> number of their R package updates (thanks!)). It seems starting to use
> the 'Reviewed-by' git message tag would make this easy to account for.
Quoting from thread [1]:
I agree that Reviewed-by would be helpful.
Once reviewed, the author or the reviewer could roll the count and
re-send the patch (or series), applying the line Reviewed-by.
It would reward the reviewer for their work. And it would help the
committer work.
Subject: Thoughts on committers pushing simple changes from other committers?
1: <https://yhetil.org/guix/86k00avhpv.fsf@gmail.com>
Cheers,
simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-09 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-01 16:13 [bug#61894] [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <871qm8wf8e.fsf@cbaines.net>
2023-03-01 19:21 ` Felix Lechner via Guix-patches via
2023-03-01 22:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-02 11:04 ` Andreas Enge
2023-03-07 1:53 ` 宋文武 via Guix-patches via
[not found] ` <ZAcTw6I31Rl3nRDE@jurong>
[not found] ` <861qm0da4y.fsf@gmail.com>
2023-03-07 18:29 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-07 22:40 ` Leo Famulari
[not found] ` <874jqvul1v.fsf@gmail.com>
2023-03-09 8:48 ` Simon Tournier [this message]
[not found] ` <ZAhRg7BjytZGGB5O@3900XT>
[not found] ` <878rg7uqb4.fsf@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <86lek6ntpb.fsf@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <874jqtte7c.fsf@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <87bkl0frnk.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <87356ar6p1.fsf@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <87bkku2e14.fsf@gnu.org>
2023-03-17 15:46 ` Maxim Cournoyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86v8janwdm.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
--cc=61894@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=andreas@enge.fr \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=guix-maintainers@gnu.org \
--cc=iyzsong@envs.net \
--cc=leo@famulari.name \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=mail@cbaines.net \
--cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).