unofficial mirror of guix-patches@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 54811@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#54811] [PATCH 0/3] Support socket activation in 'guix publish' and 'guix-daemon'
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 19:43:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7deae864707fc4aab3eadc28936775c6b920f8f9.camel@telenet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sfqk6dvi.fsf@gnu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2011 bytes --]

Ludovic Courtès schreef op zo 10-04-2022 om 19:34 [+0200]:
> Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:
> 
> > Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 09-04-2022 om 22:30 [+0200]:
> > > Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:
> > > 
> > > > Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 09-04-2022 om 11:12 [+0200]:
> > > > >   publish: Support systemd-style socket activation.
> > > > 
> > > > Does this imply that, at least when avahi/--advertise isn't used,
> > > > "guix publish" can be run in a container without network access,
> > > > in a container that only has access to /gnu/store, the private/public
> > > > key and wherever the nars are stored?
> > > 
> > > I don’t think it makes any difference.  Or am I misunderstanding?
> > 
> > Is ‘it’ = ‘the new socket activation support’, or ‘the avahi/--
> > advertise option being enabled or not’?
> 
> “It” referred to the long condition you wrote.  :-)
> 
> One thing is sure: when ‘--advertise’ is used, we shouldn’t use socket
> activation or nothing will be advertised.  Is that what you mean?

No, how would socket activation prevent advertising?  How would guile-
avahi even know that we are doing socket activation?

What I mean was:

  * if guile-avahi sends messages to the network by itself,
    then it cannot be run inside a networkless container,
    otherwise only the container's loopback would receive them.

  * if guile-avahi talks to some daemon via a unix domain socket,
    then no problem

  * IIUC, previously, "guix publish" could not be run inside a network
    container, because it tried to listen by itself (and listening
    to a container's own loopback isn't useful).

  * but in case of socket activation, this problem disappears

  * bonus: except possibly for the secret key material, "guix publish"
    does not have to be started  as root anymore even if uses a
    reserved port such as port 80 (assuming socket activation is used).

Greetings,
Maxime.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-10 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-09  9:12 [bug#54811] [PATCH 0/3] Support socket activation in 'guix publish' and 'guix-daemon' Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-09  9:13 ` [bug#54811] [PATCH 1/3] publish: Use SRFI-71 instead of SRFI-11 Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-09  9:13   ` [bug#54811] [PATCH 2/3] publish: Support systemd-style socket activation Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-09  9:20     ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-14 12:51       ` bug#54811: [PATCH 0/3] Support socket activation in 'guix publish' and 'guix-daemon' Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-09  9:13   ` [bug#54811] [PATCH 3/3] daemon: Support systemd-style socket activation Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-09  9:29     ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-09 20:28       ` [bug#54811] [PATCH 0/3] Support socket activation in 'guix publish' and 'guix-daemon' Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-09  9:19 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-09 20:30   ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-09 20:49     ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-10 17:34       ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-10 17:43         ` Maxime Devos [this message]
2022-04-11  9:48           ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-11 10:06             ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-11 20:33               ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-12  8:42                 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-12 10:15                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-12  8:48                 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-11 10:08             ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-11 20:34               ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-11 10:10             ` Maxime Devos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7deae864707fc4aab3eadc28936775c6b920f8f9.camel@telenet.be \
    --to=maximedevos@telenet.be \
    --cc=54811@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).