* gcl 2.6.12 breaks maxima
@ 2014-11-27 9:54 Federico Beffa
2014-11-27 9:56 ` Andreas Enge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Federico Beffa @ 2014-11-27 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guix-devel
Hi,
I noticed that after the update of gcl from 2.6.11 to 2.6.12, maxima
fails to build.
http://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/master/maxima-5.34.1.x86_64-linux
Could we revert to the previous version until the incompatibility
between the two is fixed?
Regards,
Fede
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gcl 2.6.12 breaks maxima
2014-11-27 9:54 gcl 2.6.12 breaks maxima Federico Beffa
@ 2014-11-27 9:56 ` Andreas Enge
2014-11-27 10:00 ` Federico Beffa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2014-11-27 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Federico Beffa; +Cc: Guix-devel
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:54:49AM +0100, Federico Beffa wrote:
> Could we revert to the previous version until the incompatibility
> between the two is fixed?
do you see a way of fixing it? That would be the best solution!
Or is it a documented and known problem?
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gcl 2.6.12 breaks maxima
2014-11-27 9:56 ` Andreas Enge
@ 2014-11-27 10:00 ` Federico Beffa
2014-11-27 12:48 ` Federico Beffa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Federico Beffa @ 2014-11-27 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: Guix-devel
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:54:49AM +0100, Federico Beffa wrote:
>> Could we revert to the previous version until the incompatibility
>> between the two is fixed?
>
> do you see a way of fixing it? That would be the best solution!
> Or is it a documented and known problem?
No, right now I do not have time to look into this, but a quick search
suggests that maybe it's a matter of gcl compilation flags.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gcl-devel/2014-10/msg00002.html
Regards,
Fede
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gcl 2.6.12 breaks maxima
2014-11-27 10:00 ` Federico Beffa
@ 2014-11-27 12:48 ` Federico Beffa
2014-11-27 22:06 ` Andreas Enge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Federico Beffa @ 2014-11-27 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: Guix-devel
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:54:49AM +0100, Federico Beffa wrote:
>>> Could we revert to the previous version until the incompatibility
>>> between the two is fixed?
>>
>> do you see a way of fixing it? That would be the best solution!
>> Or is it a documented and known problem?
>
> No, right now I do not have time to look into this, but a quick search
> suggests that maybe it's a matter of gcl compilation flags.
>
After having a look at the maxima log I suspect that we are hitting
this problem:
https://www.ma.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2008/009769.html
Regards,
Fede
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gcl 2.6.12 breaks maxima
2014-11-27 12:48 ` Federico Beffa
@ 2014-11-27 22:06 ` Andreas Enge
2014-11-28 8:23 ` Federico Beffa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2014-11-27 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Federico Beffa; +Cc: Guix-devel
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:48:31PM +0100, Federico Beffa wrote:
> After having a look at the maxima log I suspect that we are hitting
> this problem:
> https://www.ma.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2008/009769.html
Thanks for working on this! I tried dropping the 'strip' phase for gcl,
and now maxima starts to be built. So assuming it succeeds, I would suggest
to not strip gcl.
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gcl 2.6.12 breaks maxima
2014-11-27 22:06 ` Andreas Enge
@ 2014-11-28 8:23 ` Federico Beffa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Federico Beffa @ 2014-11-28 8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: Guix-devel
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:48:31PM +0100, Federico Beffa wrote:
>> After having a look at the maxima log I suspect that we are hitting
>> this problem:
>> https://www.ma.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2008/009769.html
>
> Thanks for working on this! I tried dropping the 'strip' phase for gcl,
> and now maxima starts to be built. So assuming it succeeds, I would suggest
> to not strip gcl.
>
Thanks for acting so quickly :-)
Fede
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-28 8:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-27 9:54 gcl 2.6.12 breaks maxima Federico Beffa
2014-11-27 9:56 ` Andreas Enge
2014-11-27 10:00 ` Federico Beffa
2014-11-27 12:48 ` Federico Beffa
2014-11-27 22:06 ` Andreas Enge
2014-11-28 8:23 ` Federico Beffa
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).