* Re: 02/02: gnu: cross-base: Make the libc static-bash bug more apparent.
[not found] ` <E1Yat5I-0002YS-4p@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
@ 2015-03-26 2:12 ` Mark H Weaver
2015-03-26 22:15 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2015-03-26 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> commit 12b0dbd472d1020565b2d1e3f4c72fca635db0a8
> Author: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
> Date: Wed Mar 25 21:26:31 2015 +0100
>
> gnu: cross-base: Make the libc static-bash bug more apparent.
>
> The 'static-bash' input of cross libcs has always been compiled
> natively. This patch makes the issue more visible.
>
> * gnu/packages/cross-base.scm (cross-libc): Add 'inputs' field, and
> add (package-inputs glibc) to 'native-inputs'.
> ---
> gnu/packages/cross-base.scm | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/cross-base.scm b/gnu/packages/cross-base.scm
> index 5a67d4b..dbcc5bc 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/cross-base.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/cross-base.scm
> @@ -298,8 +298,13 @@ XBINUTILS and the cross tool chain."
> ;; "linux-headers" input to point to the right thing.
> (propagated-inputs `(("linux-headers" ,xlinux-headers)))
>
> + ;; FIXME: 'static-bash' should really be an input, not a native input, but
> + ;; to do that will require building an intermediate cross libc.
> + (inputs '())
> +
> (native-inputs `(("cross-gcc" ,xgcc)
> ("cross-binutils" ,xbinutils)
> + ,@(package-inputs glibc) ;FIXME: static-bash
> ,@(package-native-inputs glibc)))))
>
> \f
This seems to have broken cross-compilation. See:
http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/103397#tabs-now-fail
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread