Re: npm has irreproducible install behavior

[Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>]

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Hi Jelle,
>
>>> I’ve tested this little addition to the build phases of node-lts on an
>>> affected system:
>>>
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>            (add-after 'install 'do-not-ignore-links
>>>              (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>>>                (with-directory-excursion
>>>                    (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out")
>>>                                   "/lib/node_modules/npm/node_modules")
>>>                  (substitute* "pacote/lib/fetcher.js"
>>>                               (("\\/Link\\$\\/.test\\(entry.type\\)") "false")
>>>                               (("\\/File\\$\\/.test\\(entry.type\\)")
>>>                                "/(File|Link)$/.test(entry.type)"))
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> The proposed change seems fine to me, provided our QA shows a pretty
>> green button at some point. Could you send a patch that also includes a
>> comment referencing the upstream bug report?
>
> I changed it to patch node-tar instead, because the patch to fetcher.js
> would cause *some* files to be copied to the wrong location.
>
> I’ll send the updated patch to guix-patches today.

Here’s the patch set:

  https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64592

The first patch is to clean up the snippet while we’re at it.  The
second changes the behavior of node-tar, so that files with hardlinks
are not treated any different from files without.

-- 
Ricardo