From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Re-approaching package tagging
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:29:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imzrgjit.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875zvsq8ov.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Lemmer Webber's message of "Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:01:20 -0500")
Hello,
Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> skribis:
> In the past when we've discussed package tagging, I think Ludo' has been
> against it, primarily because it's a giant source of bikeshedding. I
> agree that it's a huge space for bikeshedding... no space provides more
> bikeshedding than naming things, and tagging things is a many to many
> naming system.
The reason I’m unconvinced about tags is that I used to be a big fan of
them, back when debtags was introduced (long ago!), but then I had to
face reality: people (me included) would just do plain text searches,
not sophisticated tag queries.
> However, I will say that finding packages based on topical interest is
> pretty hard right now. If I want to find all the available roguelikes:
>
> cwebber@jasmine:~$ guix package -A rogue
> hyperrogue 10.5 out gnu/packages/games.scm:3652:2
> roguebox-adventures 2.2.1 out gnu/packages/games.scm:1047:2
I’m surprised you don’t mention --search, which is more appropriate than
-A (‘-A’ is here only to search among package names):
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix package -s roguelike | recsel -p name,relevance
name: roguebox-adventures
relevance: 7
name: tome4
relevance: 5
name: crawl
relevance: 5
name: crawl-tiles
relevance: 5
name: cataclysm-dda
relevance: 5
name: angband
relevance: 5
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I’m very much in favor of improving ‘--search’ until we’re happy with
the results it gives.
WDYT?
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-18 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-17 19:01 Re-approaching package tagging Christopher Lemmer Webber
2018-12-17 20:57 ` swedebugia
2018-12-17 23:08 ` zimoun
2018-12-18 7:48 ` Catonano
2018-12-18 11:34 ` Catonano
2018-12-19 6:51 ` swedebugia
2018-12-19 7:42 ` swedebugia
2018-12-18 11:29 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2018-12-18 14:54 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber
2018-12-18 10:36 ` zimoun
2018-12-19 15:04 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-12-18 20:46 ` zimoun
2018-12-19 23:12 ` zimoun
2018-12-20 7:53 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-12-20 9:44 ` Chris Marusich
2018-12-21 21:00 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-12-20 10:57 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber
2018-12-20 11:55 ` swedebugia
2018-12-21 21:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-12-19 15:05 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-12-18 20:48 ` zimoun
2018-12-20 7:55 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-12-20 14:42 ` zimoun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87imzrgjit.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=cwebber@dustycloud.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).