* Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs @ 2018-11-13 1:22 swedebugia 2018-11-14 9:47 ` Oleg Pykhalov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: swedebugia @ 2018-11-13 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guix-devel Reasons: * shorter is better. * the project it self names it sshfs. * there are no other sshfs implementations to my knowledge -- Cheers Swedebugia ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs 2018-11-13 1:22 Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs swedebugia @ 2018-11-14 9:47 ` Oleg Pykhalov 2018-11-14 11:41 ` Ricardo Wurmus 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Oleg Pykhalov @ 2018-11-14 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: swedebugia; +Cc: guix-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 851 bytes --] Hello, swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup.net> writes: > Reasons: > * shorter is better. Not always, e.g. as you see we have a policy to prefix package names like font-dejavu and emacs-guix, but I don't see this in ‘fuse’ case: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix package -A fuse | awk '{ print $1 }' enblend-enfuse fuse fuse-exfat libconfuse python-defusedxml python-fusepy python-llfuse python-llfuse python2-defusedxml python2-fusepy python2-llfuse sshfs-fuse unionfs-fuse unionfs-fuse-static --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > * the project it self names it sshfs. It was an “issue” for me to install sshfs by naive typing ‘guix package -i sshfs’ :-) > * there are no other sshfs implementations to my knowledge Agree. Oleg. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs 2018-11-14 9:47 ` Oleg Pykhalov @ 2018-11-14 11:41 ` Ricardo Wurmus 2018-11-14 17:25 ` Leo Famulari 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2018-11-14 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Pykhalov; +Cc: guix-devel Hi, I have no objections to renaming the package, though you’ll need to keep a definition for “sshfs-fuse” to indicate to users that the package has been renamed. -- Ricardo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs 2018-11-14 11:41 ` Ricardo Wurmus @ 2018-11-14 17:25 ` Leo Famulari 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Leo Famulari @ 2018-11-14 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: guix-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 332 bytes --] On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:41:59PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I have no objections to renaming the package, though you’ll need to keep > a definition for “sshfs-fuse” to indicate to users that the package has > been renamed. Right. See the definition of 'letsencrypt' in (gnu packages tls) for an example of this. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-14 17:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-11-13 1:22 Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs swedebugia 2018-11-14 9:47 ` Oleg Pykhalov 2018-11-14 11:41 ` Ricardo Wurmus 2018-11-14 17:25 ` Leo Famulari
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).